Climate change

The global map shows sea temperature rises of 0.5 to 1 degree Celsius; land temperature rises of 1 to 2 degree Celsius; and Arctic temperature rises of up to 4 degrees Celsius.
Average surface air temperatures from 2011 to 2021 compared to the 1956–1976 average
The graph from 1880 to 2020 shows natural drivers exhibiting fluctuations of about 0.3 degrees Celsius. Human drivers steadily increase by 0.3 degrees over 100 years to 1980, then steeply by 0.8 degrees more over the past 40 years.
Change in average surface air temperature since the industrial revolution, plus drivers for that change. Human activity has caused increased temperatures, with natural forces adding some variability.[1]

Contemporary climate change includes both global warming and its impacts on Earth's weather patterns. There have been previous periods of climate change, but the current rate of change is distinctly more rapid and is not due to natural causes.[2][3] Instead, it is caused by the emission of greenhouse gases, mostly carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane. Burning fossil fuels for energy production creates most of these emissions. Certain agricultural practices, industrial processes, and forest loss are additional sources.[4] Greenhouse gases are transparent to sunlight, allowing it through to heat the Earth's surface. When the Earth emits that heat as infrared radiation the gases absorb it, trapping the heat near the Earth's surface and causing global warming.

Due to climate change, deserts are expanding, while heat waves and wildfires are becoming more common.[5] Increased warming in the Arctic has contributed to melting permafrost, glacial retreat and sea ice loss.[6] Higher temperatures are also causing more intense storms, droughts, and other weather extremes.[7] Rapid environmental change in mountains, coral reefs, and the Arctic is forcing many species to relocate or become extinct.[8] Climate change threatens people with food and water scarcity, increased flooding, extreme heat, more disease, and economic loss. Human migration and conflict can also be a result.[9] The World Health Organization (WHO) calls climate change the greatest threat to global health in the 21st century.[10] Even if efforts to minimise future warming are successful, some effects will continue for centuries. These include sea level rise, and warmer, more acidic oceans.[11]

Many of these impacts are already felt at the current 1.2 °C (2.2 °F) level of warming. Additional warming will increase these impacts and may trigger tipping points, such as the melting of the Greenland ice sheet.[12] Under the 2015 Paris Agreement, nations collectively agreed to keep warming "well under 2 °C". However, with pledges made under the Agreement, global warming would still reach about 2.7 °C (4.9 °F) by the end of the century.[13] Limiting warming to 1.5 °C will require halving emissions by 2030 and achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.[14]

Bobcat Fire in Monrovia, CA, September 10, 2020
Bleached colony of Acropora coral
A dry lakebed in California, which is experiencing its worst megadrought in 1,200 years.[15]
Some effects of climate change, clockwise from top left: Wildfire intensified by heat and drought, worsening droughts compromising water supplies, and bleaching of coral caused by ocean acidification and heating.

Making deep cuts in emissions will require switching away from burning fossil fuels and towards using electricity generated from low-carbon sources. This includes phasing out coal-fired power plants, vastly increasing use of wind, solar, and other types of renewable energy, and taking measures to reduce energy use. Electricity will need to replace fossil fuels for powering transportation, heating buildings, and operating industrial facilities.[16][17] Carbon can also be removed from the atmosphere, for instance by increasing forest cover and by farming with methods that capture carbon in soil.[18] While communities may adapt to climate change through efforts like better coastline protection, they cannot avert the risk of severe, widespread, and permanent impacts.[19]

Terminology

Before the 1980s, it was unclear whether warming by increased greenhouse gases would dominate aerosol-induced cooling. Scientists then often used the term inadvertent climate modification to refer to the human impact on the climate. In the 1980s, the terms global warming and climate change were popularised. The former refers only to increased surface warming, the latter describes the full effect of greenhouse gases on the climate.[20] Global warming became the most popular term after NASA climate scientist James Hansen used it in his 1988 testimony in the U.S. Senate.[21] In the 2000s, the term climate change increased in popularity.[22] Global warming usually refers to human-induced warming of the Earth system, whereas climate change can refer to natural or anthropogenic change.[23] The two terms are often used interchangeably.[24]

Various scientists, politicians and media figures have adopted the terms climate crisis or climate emergency to talk about climate change, and global heating instead of global warming.[25] The policy editor-in-chief of The Guardian said they included this language in their editorial guidelines "to ensure that we are being scientifically precise, while also communicating clearly with readers on this very important issue".[26] In 2019, Oxford Languages chose climate emergency as its word of the year, defining it as "a situation in which urgent action is required to reduce or halt climate change and avoid potentially irreversible environmental damage resulting from it".[27][28]

Observed temperature rise

Global surface temperature reconstruction over the last 2000 years using proxy data from tree rings, corals, and ice cores in blue.[29] Directly observed data is in red.[30]

Multiple independent instrumental datasets show that the climate system is warming.[31] The 2011–2020 decade warmed to an average 1.09 °C [0.95–1.20 °C] compared to the pre-industrial baseline (1850–1900).[32] Surface temperatures are rising by about 0.2 °C per decade,[33] with 2020 reaching a temperature of 1.2 °C above the pre-industrial era.[34] Since 1950, the number of cold days and nights has decreased, and the number of warm days and nights has increased.[35]

There was little net warming between the 18th century and the mid-19th century. Climate information for that period comes from climate proxies, such as trees and ice cores.[36] Thermometer records began to provide global coverage around 1850.[37] Historical patterns of warming and cooling, like the Medieval Climate Anomaly and the Little Ice Age, did not occur at the same time across different regions. Temperatures may have reached as high as those of the late-20th century in a limited set of regions.[38] There have been prehistorical episodes of global warming, such as the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum.[39] However, the modern observed rise in temperature and CO2 concentrations has been so rapid that even abrupt geophysical events in Earth's history do not approach current rates.[40]

Evidence of warming from air temperature measurements are reinforced with a wide range of other observations.[41][42] There has been an increase in the frequency and intensity of heavy precipitation, melting of snow and land ice, and increased atmospheric humidity.[43] Flora and fauna are also behaving in a manner consistent with warming; for instance, plants are flowering earlier in spring.[44] Another key indicator is the cooling of the upper atmosphere, which demonstrates that greenhouse gases are trapping heat near the Earth's surface and preventing it from radiating into space.[45]

Regional aspects to temperature rises

Regions of the world warm at differing rates. The pattern is independent of where greenhouse gases are emitted, because the gases persist long enough to diffuse across the planet. Since the pre-industrial period, the average surface temperature over land regions has increased almost twice as fast as the global-average surface temperature.[46] This is because of the larger heat capacity of oceans, and because oceans lose more heat by evaporation.[47] The thermal energy in the global climate system has grown with only brief pauses since at least 1970, and over 90% of this extra energy has been stored in the ocean.[48][49] The rest has heated the atmosphere, melted ice, and warmed the continents.[50]

The Northern Hemisphere and the North Pole have warmed much faster than the South Pole and Southern Hemisphere. The Northern Hemisphere not only has much more land, but also more seasonal snow cover and sea ice. As these surfaces flip from reflecting a lot of light to being dark after the ice has melted, they start absorbing more heat.[51] Local black carbon deposits on snow and ice also contribute to Arctic warming.[52] Arctic temperatures are increasing at over twice the rate of the rest of the world.[53] Melting of glaciers and ice sheets in the Arctic disrupts ocean circulation, including a weakened Gulf Stream, further changing the climate.[54]

Drivers of recent temperature rise

Drivers of climate change from 1850–1900 to 2010–2019. There was no significant contribution from internal variability or solar and volcanic drivers.

The climate system experiences various cycles on its own which can last for years (such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO)), decades or even centuries.[55] Other changes are caused by an imbalance of energy that is "external" to the climate system, but not always external to the Earth.[56] Examples of external forcings include changes in the concentrations of greenhouse gases, solar luminosity, volcanic eruptions, and variations in the Earth's orbit around the Sun.[57]

To determine the human contribution to climate change, known internal climate variability and natural external forcings need to be ruled out. A key approach is to determine unique "fingerprints" for all potential causes, then compare these fingerprints with observed patterns of climate change.[58] For example, solar forcing can be ruled out as a major cause. Its fingerprint would be warming in the entire atmosphere. Yet, only the lower atmosphere has warmed, consistent with greenhouse gas forcing.[59] Attribution of recent climate change shows that the main driver is elevated greenhouse gases, with aerosols having a dampening effect.[60]

Greenhouse gases

CO2 concentrations over the last 800,000 years as measured from ice cores (blue/green) and directly (black)

Greenhouse gases are transparent to sunlight, and thus allow it to pass through the atmosphere to heat the Earth's surface. The Earth radiates it as heat, and greenhouse gases absorb a portion of it. This absorption slows the rate at which heat escapes into space, trapping heat near the Earth's surface and warming it over time.[61] Before the Industrial Revolution, naturally-occurring amounts of greenhouse gases caused the air near the surface to be about 33 °C warmer than it would have been in their absence.[62][63] While water vapour (~50%) and clouds (~25%) are the biggest contributors to the greenhouse effect, they increase as a function of temperature and are therefore feedbacks. On the other hand, concentrations of gases such as CO2 (~20%), tropospheric ozone,[64] CFCs and nitrous oxide are not temperature-dependent, and are therefore external forcings.[65]

Human activity since the Industrial Revolution, mainly extracting and burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas),[66] has increased the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, resulting in a radiative imbalance. In 2019, the concentrations of CO2 and methane had increased by about 48% and 160%, respectively, since 1750.[67] These CO2 levels are higher than they have been at any time during the last 2 million years. Concentrations of methane are far higher than they were over the last 800,000 years.[68]

The Global Carbon Project shows how additions to CO2 since 1880 have been caused by different sources ramping up one after another.

Global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions in 2019 were equivalent to 59 billion tonnes of CO2. Of these emissions, 75% was CO2, 18% was methane, 4% was nitrous oxide, and 2% was fluorinated gases.[69] CO2 emissions primarily come from burning fossil fuels to provide energy for transport, manufacturing, heating, and electricity.[4] Additional CO2 emissions come from deforestation and industrial processes, which include the CO2 released by the chemical reactions for making cement, steel, aluminum, and fertiliser.[70] Methane emissions come from livestock, manure, rice cultivation, landfills, wastewater, and coal mining, as well as oil and gas extraction.[71] Nitrous oxide emissions largely come from the microbial decomposition of fertiliser.[72]

Despite the contribution of deforestation to greenhouse gas emissions, the Earth's land surface, particularly its forests, remain a significant carbon sink for CO2. Land-surface sink processes, such as carbon fixation in the soil and photosynthesis, remove about 29% of annual global CO2 emissions.[73] The ocean also serves as a significant carbon sink via a two-step process. First, CO2 dissolves in the surface water. Afterwards, the ocean's overturning circulation distributes it deep into the ocean's interior, where it accumulates over time as part of the carbon cycle. Over the last two decades, the world's oceans have absorbed 20 to 30% of emitted CO2.[74]

Aerosols and clouds

Air pollution, in the form of aerosols, not only puts a large burden on human health, but also affects the climate on a large scale.[75] From 1961 to 1990, a gradual reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching the Earth's surface was observed, a phenomenon popularly known as global dimming,[76] typically attributed to aerosols from biofuel and fossil fuel burning.[77] Globally, aerosols have been declining since 1990, meaning that they no longer mask greenhouse gas warming as much.[78]

Aerosols scatter and absorb solar radiation. They also have indirect effects on the Earth's radiation budget. Sulfate aerosols act as cloud condensation nuclei and lead to clouds that have more and smaller cloud droplets. These clouds reflect solar radiation more efficiently than clouds with fewer and larger droplets.[79] They also reduce the growth of raindrops, which makes clouds more reflective to incoming sunlight.[80] Indirect effects of aerosols are the largest uncertainty in radiative forcing.[81]

While aerosols typically limit global warming by reflecting sunlight, black carbon in soot that falls on snow or ice can contribute to global warming. Not only does this increase the absorption of sunlight, it also increases melting and sea-level rise.[82] Limiting new black carbon deposits in the Arctic could reduce global warming by 0.2 °C by 2050.[83]

Land surface changes

The rate of global tree cover loss has approximately doubled since 2001, to an annual loss approaching an area the size of Italy.[84]

Humans change the Earth's surface mainly to create more agricultural land. Today, agriculture takes up 34% of Earth's land area, while 26% is forests, and 30% is uninhabitable (glaciers, deserts, etc.).[85] The amount of forested land continues to decrease, which is the main land use change that causes global warming.[86] Deforestation releases CO2 contained in trees when they are destroyed, plus it prevents those trees from absorbing more CO2 in the future.[87] The main causes of deforestation are: permanent land-use change from forest to agricultural land producing products such as beef and palm oil (27%), logging to produce forestry/forest products (26%), short term shifting cultivation (24%), and wildfires (23%).[88]

Land use changes not only affect greenhouse gas emissions. The type of vegetation in a region affects the local temperature. It impacts how much of the sunlight gets reflected back into space (albedo), and how much heat is lost by evaporation. For instance, the change from a dark forest to grassland makes the surface lighter, causing it to reflect more sunlight. Deforestation can also affect temperatures by modifying the release of chemical compounds that influence clouds, and by changing wind patterns.[89] In tropic and temperate areas the net effect is to produce significant warming, while at latitudes closer to the poles a gain of albedo (as forest is replaced by snow cover) leads to a cooling effect.[89] Globally, these effects are estimated to have led to a slight cooling, dominated by an increase in surface albedo.[90]

Solar and volcanic activity

Physical climate models are unable to reproduce the rapid warming observed in recent decades when taking into account only variations in solar output and volcanic activity.[91] As the Sun is the Earth's primary energy source, changes in incoming sunlight directly affect the climate system.[81] Solar irradiance has been measured directly by satellites,[92] and indirect measurements are available from the early 1600s onwards.[81] There has been no upward trend in the amount of the Sun's energy reaching the Earth.[93] Further evidence for greenhouse gases causing global warming comes from measurements that show a warming of the lower atmosphere (the troposphere), coupled with a cooling of the upper atmosphere (the stratosphere).[94] If solar variations were responsible for the observed warming, the troposphere and stratosphere would both warm.[59]

Explosive volcanic eruptions represent the largest natural forcing over the industrial era. When the eruption is sufficiently strong (with sulfur dioxide reaching the stratosphere), sunlight can be partially blocked for a couple of years. The temperature signal lasts about twice as long. In the industrial era, volcanic activity has had negligible impacts on global temperature trends.[95] Present-day volcanic CO2 emissions are equivalent to less than 1% of current anthropogenic CO2 emissions.[96]

Climate change feedback

Sea ice reflects 50% to 70% of incoming solar radiation while the dark ocean surface only reflects 6%, so melting sea ice is a self-reinforcing feedback.[97]

The response of the climate system to an initial forcing is modified by feedbacks: increased by self-reinforcing feedbacks and reduced by balancing feedbacks.[98] The main reinforcing feedbacks are the water-vapour feedback, the ice–albedo feedback, and the net effect of clouds.[99][100] The primary balancing mechanism is radiative cooling, as Earth's surface gives off more heat to space in response to rising temperature.[101] In addition to temperature feedbacks, there are feedbacks in the carbon cycle, such as the fertilizing effect of CO2 on plant growth.[102] Uncertainty over feedbacks is the major reason why different climate models project different magnitudes of warming for a given amount of emissions.[103]

As the air is warmed by greenhouse gases, it can hold more moisture. Water vapour is a potent greenhouse gas, so this further heats the atmosphere.[99] If cloud cover increases, more sunlight will be reflected back into space, cooling the planet. If clouds become higher and thinner, they act as an insulator, reflecting heat from below back downwards and warming the planet.[104] The effect of clouds is the largest source of feedback uncertainty.[105]

Another major feedback is the reduction of snow cover and sea ice in the Arctic, which reduces the reflectivity of the Earth's surface.[106] More of the Sun's energy is now absorbed in these regions, contributing to amplification of Arctic temperature changes.[107] Arctic amplification is also melting permafrost, which releases methane and CO2 into the atmosphere.[108] Climate change can also cause methane releases from wetlands, marine systems, and freshwater systems.[109] Overall, climate feedbacks are expected to become increasingly positive.[110]

Around half of human-caused CO2 emissions have been absorbed by land plants and by the oceans.[111] On land, elevated CO2 and an extended growing season have stimulated plant growth. Climate change increases droughts and heat waves that inhibit plant growth, which makes it uncertain whether this carbon sink will continue to grow in the future.[112] Soils contain large quantities of carbon and may release some when they heat up.[113] As more CO2 and heat are absorbed by the ocean, it acidifies, its circulation changes and phytoplankton takes up less carbon, decreasing the rate at which the ocean absorbs atmospheric carbon.[114] Overall, at higher CO2 concentrations the Earth will absorb a reduced fraction of our emissions.[115]

Future warming and the carbon budget

Projected global surface temperature changes relative to 1850–1900, based on CMIP6 multi-model mean changes

A climate model is a representation of the physical, chemical, and biological processes that affect the climate system.[116] Models are used to calculate the degree of warming future emissions will cause when accounting for the strength of climate feedbacks.[117][118] Models also include natural processes like changes in the Earth's orbit, historical changes in the Sun's activity, and volcanic forcing.[119] In addition to estimating future temperatures, they reproduce and predict the circulation of the oceans, the annual cycle of the seasons, and the flows of carbon between the land surface and the atmosphere.[120]

The physical realism of models is tested by examining their ability to simulate contemporary or past climates.[121] Past models have underestimated the rate of Arctic shrinkage[122] and underestimated the rate of precipitation increase.[123] Sea level rise since 1990 was underestimated in older models, but more recent models agree well with observations.[124] The 2017 United States-published National Climate Assessment notes that "climate models may still be underestimating or missing relevant feedback processes".[125]

A subset of climate models add societal factors to a simple physical climate model. These models simulate how population, economic growth, and energy use affect – and interact with – the physical climate. With this information, these models can produce scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions. This is then used as input for physical climate models and carbon cycle models to predict how atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases might change in the future.[126][127] Depending on the socioeconomic scenario and the mitigation scenario, models produce atmospheric CO2 concentrations that range widely between 380 and 1400 ppm.[128]

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report projects that global warming is very likely to reach 1.0 °C to 1.8 °C by the late 21st century under the very low GHG emissions scenario. In an intermediate scenario global warming would reach 2.1 °C to 3.5 °C, and 3.3 °C to 5.7 °C under the very high GHG emissions scenario.[129] These projections are based on climate models in combination with observations.[130]

The remaining carbon budget is determined by modelling the carbon cycle and the climate sensitivity to greenhouse gases.[131] According to the IPCC, global warming can be kept below 1.5 °C with a two-thirds chance if emissions after 2018 do not exceed 420 or 570 gigatonnes of CO2. This corresponds to 10 to 13 years of current emissions. There are high uncertainties about the budget. For instance, it may be 100 gigatonnes of CO2 smaller due to methane release from permafrost and wetlands.[132] However, it is clear that fossil fuel resources are too abundant for shortages to be relied on to limit carbon emissions in the 21st century.[133]

Impacts

The sixth IPCC Assessment Report projects changes in average soil moisture that can disrupt agriculture and ecosystems. A reduction in soil moisture by one standard deviation means that average soil moisture will approximately match the ninth driest year between 1850 and 1900 at that location.

Environmental effects

The environmental effects of climate change are broad and far-reaching, affecting oceans, ice, and weather. Changes may occur gradually or rapidly. Evidence for these effects comes from studying climate change in the past, from modelling, and from modern observations.[134] Since the 1950s, droughts and heat waves have appeared simultaneously with increasing frequency.[135] Extremely wet or dry events within the monsoon period have increased in India and East Asia.[136] The rainfall rate and intensity of hurricanes and typhoons is likely increasing,[137] and the geographic range likely expanding poleward in response to climate warming.[138] Frequency of tropical cyclones has not increased as a result of climate change.[139]

Historical sea level reconstruction and projections up to 2100 published in 2017 by the U.S. Global Change Research Program[140]

Global sea level is rising as a consequence of glacial melt, melt of the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica, and thermal expansion. Between 1993 and 2020, the rise increased over time, averaging 3.3 ± 0.3 mm per year.[141] Over the 21st century, the IPCC projects that in a very high emissions scenario the sea level could rise by 61–110 cm.[142] Increased ocean warmth is undermining and threatening to unplug Antarctic glacier outlets, risking a large melt of the ice sheet[143] and the possibility of a 2-meter sea level rise by 2100 under high emissions.[144]

Climate change has led to decades of shrinking and thinning of the Arctic sea ice.[145] While ice-free summers are expected to be rare at 1.5 °C degrees of warming, they are set to occur once every three to ten years at a warming level of 2 °C.[146] Higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations have led to changes in ocean chemistry. An increase in dissolved CO2 is causing oceans to acidify.[147] In addition, oxygen levels are decreasing as oxygen is less soluble in warmer water.[148] Dead zones in the ocean, regions with very little oxygen, are expanding too.[149]

Tipping points and long-term impacts

Greater degrees of global warming increase the risk of passing through ‘tipping points’—thresholds beyond which certain impacts can no longer be avoided even if temperatures are reduced.[150][151] An example is the collapse of West Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, where a temperature rise of 1.5 to 2 °C may commit the ice sheets to melt, although the time scale of melt is uncertain and depends on future warming.[152][153] Some large-scale changes could occur over a short time period, such as a shutdown of certain ocean currents like the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).[154] Tipping points can also include irreversible damage to ecosystems like the Amazon rainforest and coral reefs.[155]

The long-term effects of climate change include further ice melt, ocean warming, sea level rise, and ocean acidification.[156] On the timescale of centuries to millennia, the magnitude of climate change will be determined primarily by anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This is due to CO2's long atmospheric lifetime.[157] Oceanic CO2 uptake is slow enough that ocean acidification will continue for hundreds to thousands of years.[158] These emissions are estimated to have prolonged the current interglacial period by at least 100,000 years.[159] Sea level rise will continue over many centuries, with an estimated rise of 2.3 metres per degree Celsius (4.2 ft/°F) after 2000 years.[160]

Nature and wildlife

Recent warming has driven many terrestrial and freshwater species poleward and towards higher altitudes.[161] Higher atmospheric CO2 levels and an extended growing season have resulted in global greening. However, heatwaves and drought have reduced ecosystem productivity in some regions. The future balance of these opposing effects is unclear.[162] Climate change has contributed to the expansion of drier climate zones, such as the expansion of deserts in the subtropics.[163] The size and speed of global warming is making abrupt changes in ecosystems more likely.[164] Overall, it is expected that climate change will result in the extinction of many species.[165]

The oceans have heated more slowly than the land, but plants and animals in the ocean have migrated towards the colder poles faster than species on land.[166] Just as on land, heat waves in the ocean occur more frequently due to climate change, harming a wide range of organisms such as corals, kelp, and seabirds.[167] Ocean acidification makes it harder for organisms such as mussels, barnacles and corals to produce shells and skeletons; and heatwaves have bleached coral reefs.[168] Harmful algal blooms enhanced by climate change and eutrophication lower oxygen levels, disrupt food webs and cause great loss of marine life.[169] Coastal ecosystems are under particular stress. Almost half of global wetlands have disappeared due to climate change and other human impacts.[170]

Climate change impacts on the environment

Humans

The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (2021) projects that extreme weather will be progressively more common as the Earth warms.[175]

The effects of climate change on humans have been observed worldwide. They are mostly due to warming and shifts in precipitation. Impacts can now be observed on all continents and ocean regions,[176] with low-latitude, less developed areas facing the greatest risk.[177] Continued warming has potentially “severe, pervasive and irreversible impacts” for people and ecosystems.[178] The risks are unevenly distributed, but are generally greater for disadvantaged people in developing and developed countries.[179]

Food and health

The WHO has classified climate change as the greatest threat to global health in the 21st century.[180] Extreme weather leads to injury and loss of life,[181] and crop failures to undernutrition.[182] Various infectious diseases are more easily transmitted in a warmer climate, such as dengue fever and malaria.[183] Young children are the most vulnerable to food shortages. Both children and older people are vulnerable to extreme heat.[184] The World Health Organization (WHO) has estimated that between 2030 and 2050, climate change would cause around 250,000 additional deaths per year. They assessed deaths from heat exposure in elderly people, increases in diarrhea, malaria, dengue, coastal flooding, and childhood undernutrition.[185] Over 500,000 more adult deaths are projected yearly by 2050 due to reductions in food availability and quality.[186] By 2100, 50% to 75% of the global population may face climate conditions that are life threatening due to combined effects of extreme heat and humidity.[187]

Climate change is affecting food security. It has caused reduction in global yields of maize, wheat, and soybeans between 1981 and 2010.[188] Future warming could further reduce global yields of major crops.[189] Crop production will probably be negatively affected in low-latitude countries, while effects at northern latitudes may be positive or negative.[190] Up to an additional 183 million people worldwide, particularly those with lower incomes, are at risk of hunger as a consequence of these impacts.[191] Climate change also impacts fish populations. Globally, less will be available to be fished.[192] Regions dependent on glacier water, regions that are already dry, and small islands have a higher risk of water stress due to climate change.[193]

Livelihoods

Economic damages due to climate change may be severe and there is a chance of disastrous consequences.[194] Climate change has likely already increased global economic inequality, and this trend is projected to continue.[195] Most of the severe impacts are expected in sub-Saharan Africa, where most of the local inhabitants are dependent upon natural and agricultural resources[196], and South-East Asia.[197] The World Bank estimates that climate change could drive over 120 million people into poverty by 2030.[198]

Current inequalities based on wealth and social status have worsened due to climate change.[199] Major difficulties in mitigating, adapting, and recovering to climate shocks are faced by marginalized people who have less control over resources.[200][196] Indigenous people, who are subsistent on their land and ecosystems, will face endangerment to their wellness and lifestyles due to climate change.[201] An expert elicitation concluded that the role of climate change in armed conflict has been small compared to factors such as socio-economic inequality and state capabilities.[202]

Low-lying islands and coastal communities are threatened by sea level rise, which makes flooding more common. Sometimes, land is permanently lost to the sea.[203] This could lead to statelessness for people in island nations, such as the Maldives and Tuvalu.[204] In some regions, the rise in temperature and humidity may be too severe for humans to adapt to.[205] With worst-case climate change, models project that almost one-third of humanity might live in extremely hot and uninhabitable climates, similar to the current climate found in the Sahara.[206] These factors can drive environmental migration, both within and between countries.[9] More people are expected to be displaced because of sea level rise, extreme weather and conflict from increased competition over natural resources. Climate change may also increase vulnerability, leading to "trapped populations" who are not able to move due to a lack of resources.[207]

Climate change impacts on people

Reducing and recapturing emissions

Global greenhouse gas emission scenarios, based on policies and pledges as of 11/21

Climate change can be mitigated by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and by enhancing sinks that absorb greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.[213] In order to limit global warming to less than 1.5 °C with a high likelihood of success, global greenhouse gas emissions needs to be net-zero by 2050, or by 2070 with a 2 °C target.[132] This requires far-reaching, systemic changes on an unprecedented scale in energy, land, cities, transport, buildings, and industry.[214] The United Nations Environment Programme estimates that countries need to triple their pledges under the Paris Agreement within the next decade to limit global warming to 2 °C. An even greater level of reduction is required to meet the 1.5 °C goal.[215] With pledges made under the Agreement as of October 2021, global warming would still have a 66% chance of reaching about 2.7 °C (range: 2.2–3.2 °C) by the end of the century.[13]

Although there is no single pathway to limit global warming to 1.5 or 2 °C,[216] most scenarios and strategies see a major increase in the use of renewable energy in combination with increased energy efficiency measures to generate the needed greenhouse gas reductions.[217] To reduce pressures on ecosystems and enhance their carbon sequestration capabilities, changes would also be necessary in agriculture and forestry,[218] such as preventing deforestation and restoring natural ecosystems by reforestation.[219]

Other approaches to mitigating climate change have a higher level of risk. Scenarios that limit global warming to 1.5 °C typically project the large-scale use of carbon dioxide removal methods over the 21st century.[220] There are concerns, though, about over-reliance on these technologies, and environmental impacts.[221] Solar radiation management (SRM) is also a possible supplement to deep reductions in emissions. However, SRM would raise significant ethical and legal issues, and the risks are poorly understood.[222]

Clean energy

Coal, oil, and natural gas remain the primary global energy sources even as renewables have begun rapidly increasing.[223]
Wind and solar power, Germany

Renewable energy is key to limiting climate change.[224] Fossil fuels accounted for 80% of the world's energy in 2018. The remaining share was split between nuclear power and renewables (including hydropower, bioenergy, wind and solar power and geothermal energy).[225] That mix is projected to change significantly over the next 30 years.[217] Solar panels and onshore wind are now among the cheapest forms of adding new power generation capacity in many locations.[226] Renewables represented 75% of all new electricity generation installed in 2019, nearly all solar and wind.[227] Other forms of clean energy, such as nuclear and hydropower, currently have a larger share of the energy supply. However, their future growth forecasts appear limited in comparison.[228]

To achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, renewable energy would become the dominant form of electricity generation, rising to 85% or more by 2050 in some scenarios. Investment in coal would be eliminated and coal use nearly phased out by 2050.[229][230]

Electricity would also need to become the main energy source for heating and transport.[231] In transport, emissions can be reduced fast by a switch to electric vehicles.[232] Public transport and active transport (cycling and walking) also produce less CO2.[233] For shipping and flying, low-carbon fuels can be used to reduce emissions.[232] Heating would be increasingly decarbonised with technologies like heat pumps.[234]

There are obstacles to the continued rapid growth of clean energy, including renewables. For wind and solar, there are environmental and land use concerns for new projects.[235] Wind and solar also produce energy intermittently and with seasonal variability. Traditionally, hydro dams with reservoirs and conventional power plants have been used when variable energy production is low. Going forward, battery storage can be expanded, energy demand and supply can be matched, and long-distance transmission can smooth variability of renewable outputs.[224] Bioenergy is often not carbon-neutral and may have negative consequences for food security.[236] The growth of nuclear power is constrained by controversy around nuclear waste, nuclear weapon proliferation, and accidents.[237][238] Hydropower growth is limited by the fact that the best sites have been developed, and new projects are confronting increased social and environmental concerns.[239]

Low-carbon energy improves human health by minimising climate change. It also has the near-term benefit of reducing air pollution deaths,[240] which were estimated at 7 million annually in 2016.[241] Meeting the Paris Agreement goals that limit warming to a 2 °C increase could save about a million of those lives per year by 2050, whereas limiting global warming to 1.5 °C could save millions and simultaneously increase energy security and reduce poverty.[242]

Energy conservation

Reducing energy demand is another major aspect of reducing emissions.[243] If less energy is needed, there is more flexibility for clean energy development. It also makes it easier to manage the electricity grid, and minimises carbon-intensive infrastructure development.[244] Major increases in energy efficiency investment will be required to achieve climate goals, comparable to the level of investment in renewable energy.[245] Several COVID-19 related changes in energy use patterns, energy efficiency investments, and funding have made forecasts for this decade more difficult and uncertain.[246]

Strategies to reduce energy demand vary by sector. In transport, passengers and freight can switch to more efficient travel modes, such as buses and trains, or use electric vehicles.[247] Industrial strategies to reduce energy demand include improving heating systems and motors, designing less energy-intensive products, and increasing product lifetimes.[248] In the building sector the focus is on better design of new buildings, and higher levels of energy efficiency in retrofitting.[249] The use of technologies like heat pumps can also increase building energy efficiency.[250]

Agriculture and industry

Taking into account direct and indirect emissions, industry is the sector with the highest share of global emissions.

Agriculture and forestry face a triple challenge of limiting greenhouse gas emissions, preventing the further conversion of forests to agricultural land, and meeting increases in world food demand.[251] A set of actions could reduce agriculture and forestry-based emissions by two thirds from 2010 levels. These include reducing growth in demand for food and other agricultural products, increasing land productivity, protecting and restoring forests, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production.[252]

On the demand side, a key component of reducing emissions is shifting people towards plant-based diets.[253] Eliminating the production of livestock for meat and dairy would eliminate about 3/4ths of all emissions from agriculture and other land use.[254] Livestock also occupy 37% of ice-free land area on Earth and consume feed from the 12% of land area used for crops, driving deforestation and land degradation.[255]

Steel and cement production are responsible for about 13% of industrial CO2 emissions. In these industries, carbon-intensive materials such as coke and lime play an integral role in the production, so that reducing CO2 emissions requires research into alternative chemistries.[256]

Carbon sequestration

Most CO2 emissions have been absorbed by carbon sinks, including plant growth, soil uptake, and ocean uptake (2020 Global Carbon Budget).

Natural carbon sinks can be enhanced to sequester significantly larger amounts of CO2 beyond naturally occurring levels.[257] Reforestation and tree planting on non-forest lands are among the most mature sequestration techniques, although the latter raises food security concerns.[258] Farmers can promote sequestration of carbon in soils through practices such as use of winter cover crops, reducing the intensity and frequency of tillage, and using compost and manure as soil amendments.[259] Restoration/recreation of coastal wetlands and seagrass meadows increases the uptake of carbon into organic matter (blue carbon).[260] When carbon is sequestered in soils and in organic matter such as trees, there is a risk of the carbon being re-released into the atmosphere later through changes in land use, fire, or other changes in ecosystems.[261]

Where energy production or CO2-intensive heavy industries continue to produce waste CO2, the gas can be captured and stored instead of released to the atmosphere. Although its current use is limited in scale and expensive,[262] carbon capture and storage (CCS) may be able to play a significant role in limiting CO2 emissions by mid-century.[263] This technique, in combination with bio-energy (BECCS) can result in net negative emissions: CO2 is drawn from the atmosphere.[264] It remains highly uncertain whether carbon dioxide removal techniques, such as BECCS, will be able to play a large role in limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Policy decisions that rely on carbon dioxide removal increase the risk of global warming rising beyond international goals.[265]

Adapting to a changing climate

Adaptation is "the process of adjustment to current or expected changes in climate and its effects".[266] Without additional mitigation, adaptation cannot avert the risk of "severe, widespread and irreversible" impacts.[267] More severe climate change requires more transformative adaptation, which can be prohibitively expensive.[266] The capacity and potential for humans to adapt is unevenly distributed across different regions and populations, and developing countries generally have less.[268] The first two decades of the 21st century saw an increase in adaptive capacity in most low- and middle-income countries with improved access to basic sanitation and electricity, but progress is slow. Many countries have implemented adaptation policies. However, there is a considerable gap between necessary and available finance.[269]

Adaptation to sea level rise consists of avoiding at-risk areas, learning to live with increased flooding and protection. If that fails, managed retreat may be needed.[270] There are economic barriers for tackling dangerous heat impact. Avoiding strenuous work or having air conditioning is not possible for everybody.[271] In agriculture, adaptation options include a switch to more sustainable diets, diversification, erosion control and genetic improvements for increased tolerance to a changing climate.[272] Insurance allows for risk-sharing, but is often difficult to get for people on lower incomes.[273] Education, migration and early warning systems can reduce climate vulnerability.[274]

Ecosystems adapt to climate change, a process that can be supported by human intervention. By increasing connectivity between ecosystems, species can migrate to more favourable climate conditions. Species can also be introduced to areas acquiring a favorable climate. Protection and restoration of natural and semi-natural areas helps build resilience, making it easier for ecosystems to adapt. Many of the actions that promote adaptation in ecosystems, also help humans adapt via ecosystem-based adaptation. For instance, restoration of natural fire regimes makes catastrophic fires less likely, and reduces human exposure. Giving rivers more space allows for more water storage in the natural system, reducing flood risk. Restored forest acts as a carbon sink, but planting trees in unsuitable regions can exacerbate climate impacts.[275]

There are synergies and trade-offs between adaptation and mitigation. Adaptation often offer short-term benefits, whereas mitigation has longer-term benefits.[276] Increased use of air conditioning allows people to better cope with heat, but increases energy demand. Compact urban development may lead to reduced emissions from transport and construction. At the same time, it may increase the urban heat island effect, leading to higher temperatures and increased exposure.[277] Increased food productivity has large benefits for both adaptation and mitigation.[278]

Policies and politics

The Climate Change Performance Index ranks countries by greenhouse gas emissions (40% of score), renewable energy (20%), energy use (20%), and climate policy (20%).
  High
  Medium
  Low
  Very Low

Countries that are most vulnerable to climate change have typically been responsible for a small share of global emissions. This raises questions about justice and fairness.[279] Climate change is strongly linked to sustainable development. Limiting global warming makes it easier to achieve sustainable development goals, such as eradicating poverty and reducing inequalities. The connection is recognised in Sustainable Development Goal 13 which is to "take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts".[280] The goals on food, clean water and ecosystem protection have synergies with climate mitigation.[281]

The geopolitics of climate change is complex. It has often been framed as a free-rider problem, in which all countries benefit from mitigation done by other countries, but individual countries would lose from switching to a low-carbon economy themselves. This framing has been challenged. For instance, the benefits of a coal phase-out to public health and local environments exceed the costs in almost all regions.[282] Furthermore, net importers of fossil fuels win economically from switching to clean energy, causing net exporters to face stranded assets: fossil fuels they cannot sell.[283]

Policy options

A wide range of policies, regulations, and laws are being used to reduce emissions. As of 2019, carbon pricing covers about 20% of global greenhouse gas emissions.[284] Carbon can be priced with carbon taxes and emissions trading systems.[285] Direct global fossil fuel subsidies reached $319 billion in 2017, and $5.2 trillion when indirect costs such as air pollution are priced in.[286] Ending these can cause a 28% reduction in global carbon emissions and a 46% reduction in air pollution deaths.[287] Money saved on fossil subsidies could be used to support the transition to clean energy instead.[288] More direct methods to reduce greenhouse gases include vehicle efficiency standards, renewable fuel standards, and air pollution regulations on heavy industry.[289] Several countries require utilities to increase the share of renewables in power production.[290]

Policy designed through the lens of climate justice tries to address human rights issues and social inequality. For instance, wealthy nations responsible for the largest share of emissions would have to pay poorer countries to adapt.[291] As the use of fossil fuels is reduced, jobs in the sector are being lost. To achieve a just transition, these people would need to be retrained for other jobs. Communities with many fossil fuel workers would need additional investments.[292]

International climate agreements

Since 2000, rising CO2 emissions in China and the rest of world have surpassed the output of the United States and Europe.[293]
Per person, the United States generates CO2 at a far faster rate than other primary regions.[293]

Nearly all countries in the world are parties to the 1994 United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).[294] The goal of the UNFCCC is to prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system.[295] As stated in the convention, this requires that greenhouse gas concentrations are stabilised in the atmosphere at a level where ecosystems can adapt naturally to climate change, food production is not threatened, and economic development can be sustained.[296] The UNFCCC does not itself restrict emissions but rather provides a framework for protocols that do. Global emissions have risen since the UNFCCC was signed.[297] Its yearly conferences are the stage of global negotiations.[298]

The 1997 Kyoto Protocol extended the UNFCCC and included legally binding commitments for most developed countries to limit their emissions.[299] During the negotiations, the G77 (representing developing countries) pushed for a mandate requiring developed countries to "[take] the lead" in reducing their emissions,[300] since developed countries contributed most to the accumulation of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Per-capita emissions were also still relatively low in developing countries and developing countries would need to emit more to meet their development needs.[301]

The 2009 Copenhagen Accord has been widely portrayed as disappointing because of its low goals, and was rejected by poorer nations including the G77.[302] Associated parties aimed to limit the global temperature rise to below 2 °C.[303] The Accord set the goal of sending $100 billion per year to developing countries for mitigation and adaptation by 2020, and proposed the founding of the Green Climate Fund.[304] As of 2020, the fund has failed to reach its expected target, and risks a shrinkage in its funding.[305]

In 2015 all UN countries negotiated the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep global warming well below 2.0 °C and contains an aspirational goal of keeping warming under 1.5 °C.[306] The agreement replaced the Kyoto Protocol. Unlike Kyoto, no binding emission targets were set in the Paris Agreement. Instead, a set of procedures was made binding. Countries have to regularly set ever more ambitious goals and reevaluate these goals every five years.[307] The Paris Agreement restated that developing countries must be financially supported.[308] As of October 2021, 194 states and the European Union have signed the treaty and 191 states and the EU have ratified or acceded to the agreement.[309]

The 1987 Montreal Protocol, an international agreement to stop emitting ozone-depleting gases, may have been more effective at curbing greenhouse gas emissions than the Kyoto Protocol specifically designed to do so.[310] The 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol aims to reduce the emissions of hydrofluorocarbons, a group of powerful greenhouse gases which served as a replacement for banned ozone-depleting gases. This made the Montreal Protocol a stronger agreement against climate change.[311]

National responses

In 2019, the United Kingdom parliament became the first national government to declare a climate emergency.[312] Other countries and jurisdictions followed suit.[313] That same year, the European Parliament declared a "climate and environmental emergency".[314] The European Commission presented its European Green Deal with the goal of making the EU carbon-neutral by 2050.[315] Major countries in Asia have made similar pledges: South Korea and Japan have committed to become carbon-neutral by 2050, and China by 2060.[316] In 2021, the European Commission released its “Fit for 55” legislation package, which contains guidelines for the car industry; all new cars on the European market must be zero-emission vehicles from 2035.[317] While India has strong incentives for renewables, it also plans a significant expansion of coal in the country.[318]

As of 2021, based on information from 48 national climate plans, which represent 40% of the parties to the Paris Agreement, estimated total greenhouse gas emissions will be 0.5% lower compared to 2010 levels, below the 45% or 25% reduction goals to limit global warming to 1.5 °C or 2 °C, respectively.[319]

Society

Denial and misinformation

Data has been cherry picked from short periods to falsely assert that global temperatures are not rising. Blue trendlines show short periods that mask longer-term warming trends (red trendlines). Blue dots show the so-called global warming hiatus.[320]

Public debate about climate change has been strongly affected by climate change denial and misinformation, which originated in the United States and has since spread to other countries, particularly Canada and Australia. The actors behind climate change denial form a well-funded and relatively coordinated coalition of fossil fuel companies, industry groups, conservative think tanks, and contrarian scientists.[321] Like the tobacco industry, the main strategy of these groups has been to manufacture doubt about scientific data and results.[322] Many who deny, dismiss, or hold unwarranted doubt about the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change are labelled as "climate change skeptics", which several scientists have noted is a misnomer.[323]

There are different variants of climate denial: some deny that warming takes place at all, some acknowledge warming but attribute it to natural influences, and some minimise the negative impacts of climate change.[324] Manufacturing uncertainty about the science later developed into a manufactured controversy: creating the belief that there is significant uncertainty about climate change within the scientific community in order to delay policy changes.[325] Strategies to promote these ideas include criticism of scientific institutions,[326] and questioning the motives of individual scientists.[324] An echo chamber of climate-denying blogs and media has further fomented misunderstanding of climate change.[327]

Public awareness and opinion

The public substantially underestimates the degree of scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change.[328] Studies from 2019–2021[329][3][330] found scientific consensus to range from 98.7–100%.

Climate change came to international public attention in the late 1980s.[331] Due to media coverage in the early 1990s, people often confused climate change with other environmental issues like ozone depletion.[332] In popular culture, the climate fiction movie The Day After Tomorrow (2004) and the Al Gore documentary An Inconvenient Truth (2006) focused on climate change.[331]

Significant regional, gender, age and political differences exist in both public concern for, and understanding of, climate change. More highly educated people, and in some countries, women and younger people, were more likely to see climate change as a serious threat.[333] Partisan gaps also exist in many countries,[334] and countries with high CO2 emissions tend to be less concerned.[335] Views on causes of climate change vary widely between countries.[336] Concern has increased over time,[334] to the point where in 2021 a majority of citizens in many countries express a high level of worry about climate change, or view it as a global emergency.[337] Higher levels of worry are associated with stronger public support for policies that address climate change.[338]

Climate movement

Climate protests demand that political leaders take action to prevent climate change. They can take the form of public demonstrations, fossil fuel divestment, lawsuits and other activities.[339] Prominent demonstrations include the School Strike for Climate. In this initiative, young people across the globe have been protesting since 2018 by skipping school on Fridays, inspired by Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg.[340] Mass civil disobedience actions by groups like Extinction Rebellion have protested by disrupting roads and public transport.[341] Litigation is increasingly used as a tool to strengthen climate action from public institutions and companies. Activists also initiate lawsuits which target governments and demand that they take ambitious action or enforce existing laws on climate change.[342] Lawsuits against fossil-fuel companies generally seek compensation for loss and damage.[343]

History

Early discoveries

This 1912 article succinctly describes the greenhouse effect, how burning coal creates carbon dioxide to cause climate change.[344]

In the 1820s, Joseph Fourier proposed the greenhouse effect to explain why Earth's temperature was higher than the sun's energy alone could explain. Earth's atmosphere is transparent to sunlight, so sunlight reaches the surface where it is converted to heat. However, the atmosphere is not transparent to heat radiating from the surface, and captures some of that heat, which in turn warms the planet.[345]

In 1856 Eunice Newton Foote demonstrated that the warming effect of the sun is greater for air with water vapour than for dry air, and that the effect is even greater with carbon dioxide (CO2). She concluded that "An atmosphere of that gas would give to our earth a high temperature..."[346][347]

Starting in 1859,[348] John Tyndall established that nitrogen and oxygen—together totaling 99% of dry air—are transparent to radiated heat. However, water vapour and gases such as methane and carbon dioxide absorb radiated heat and re-radiate that heat into the atmosphere. Tyndall proposed that changes in the concentrations of these gases may have caused climatic changes in the past, including ice ages.[349]

Svante Arrhenius noted that water vapour in air continuously varied, but the CO2 concentration in air was influenced by long-term geological processes. Warming from increased CO2 levels would increase the amount of water vapour, amplifying warming in a positive feedback loop. In 1896, he published the first climate model of its kind, projecting that halving CO2 levels could have produced a drop in temperature initiating an ice age. Arrhenius calculated the temperature increase expected from doubling CO2 to be around 5–6 °C.[350] Other scientists were initially skeptical and believed that the greenhouse effect was saturated so that adding more CO2 would make no difference, and that the climate would be self-regulating.[351] Beginning in 1938, Guy Stewart Callendar published evidence that climate was warming and CO2 levels were rising,[352] but his calculations met the same objections.[351]

Development of a scientific consensus

In the 1950s, Gilbert Plass created a detailed computer model that included different atmospheric layers and the infrared spectrum. This model predicted that increasing CO2 levels would cause warming. Around the same time, Hans Suess found evidence that CO2 levels had been rising, and Roger Revelle showed that the oceans would not absorb the increase. The two scientists subsequently helped Charles Keeling to begin a record of continued increase, which has been termed the "Keeling Curve".[351] Scientists alerted the public,[353] and the dangers were highlighted at James Hansen's 1988 Congressional testimony.[354] The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, set up in 1988 to provide formal advice to the world's governments, spurred interdisciplinary research.[355]

There is a near-complete scientific consensus that the climate is warming and that this is caused by human activities. As of 2019, agreement in recent literature reached over 99%.[356][357] No scientific body of national or international standing disagrees with this view.[358] Consensus has further developed that some form of action should be taken to protect people against the impacts of climate change. National science academies have called on world leaders to cut global emissions.[359]

Scientific discussion takes place in journal articles that are peer-reviewed. Scientists assess these every few years in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports.[360] The 2021 IPCC Assessment Report stated that it is "unequivocal" that climate change is caused by humans.[357]

See also

References

  1. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 2021, SPM-7
  2. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch1 2018, p. 54: These global-level rates of human-driven change far exceed the rates of change driven by geophysical or biosphere forces that have altered the Earth System trajectory in the past…
  3. ^ a b Lynas, Mark; Houlton, Benjamin Z.; Perry, Simon (19 October 2021). "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (11): 114005. Bibcode:2021ERL....16k4005L. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966. S2CID 239032360.
  4. ^ a b Our World in Data, 18 September 2020
  5. ^ IPCC SRCCL 2019, p. 7: Since the pre-industrial period, the land surface air temperature has risen nearly twice as much as the global average temperature (high confidence). Climate change... contributed to desertification and land degradation in many regions (high confidence).; IPCC SRCCL 2019, p. 45: Climate change is playing an increasing role in determining wildfire regimes alongside human activity (medium confidence), with future climate variability expected to enhance the risk and severity of wildfires in many biomes such as tropical rainforests (high confidence).
  6. ^ IPCC SROCC 2019, p. 16: Over the last decades, global warming has led to widespread shrinking of the cryosphere, with mass loss from ice sheets and glaciers (very high confidence), reductions in snow cover (high confidence) and Arctic sea ice extent and thickness (very high confidence), and increased permafrost temperature (very high confidence).
  7. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Ch11 2021, p. 1517
  8. ^ EPA (19 January 2017). "Climate Impacts on Ecosystems". Archived from the original on 27 January 2018. Retrieved 5 February 2019. Mountain and arctic ecosystems and species are particularly sensitive to climate change... As ocean temperatures warm and the acidity of the ocean increases, bleaching and coral die-offs are likely to become more frequent.
  9. ^ a b Cattaneo et al. 2019; UN Environment, 25 October 2018.
  10. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, pp. 13–16; WHO, Nov 2015: "Climate change is the greatest threat to global health in the 21st century. Health professionals have a duty of care to current and future generations. You are on the front line in protecting people from climate impacts – from more heat-waves and other extreme weather events; from outbreaks of infectious diseases such as malaria, dengue and cholera; from the effects of malnutrition; as well as treating people that are affected by cancer, respiratory, cardiovascular and other non-communicable diseases caused by environmental pollution."
  11. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch1 2018, p. 64: Sustained net zero anthropogenic emissions of CO2 and declining net anthropogenic non-CO2 radiative forcing over a multi-decade period would halt anthropogenic global warming over that period, although it would not halt sea level rise or many other aspects of climate system adjustment.
  12. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. 71
  13. ^ a b United Nations Environment Programme 2021, p. 36: "A continuation of the effort implied by the latest unconditional NDCs and announced pledges is at present estimated to result in warming of about 2.7 °C (range: 2.2–3.2 °C) with a 66 per cent chance."
  14. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, pp. 95–96: In model pathways with no or limited overshoot of 1.5 °C, global net anthropogenic CO2 emissions decline by about 45% from 2010 levels by 2030 (40–60% interquartile range), reaching net zero around 2050 (2045–2055 interquartile range); IPCC SR15 2018, p. 17, SPM C.3:All pathways that limit global warming to 1.5 °C with limited or no overshoot project the use of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) on the order of 100–1000 GtCO2 over the 21st century. CDR would be used to compensate for residual emissions and, in most cases, achieve net negative emissions to return global warming to 1.5 °C following a peak (high confidence). CDR deployment of several hundreds of GtCO2 is subject to multiple feasibility and sustainability constraints (high confidence).; Rogelj et al. 2015; Hilaire et al. 2019
  15. ^ Irina Ivanova (2 June 2022). "California is rationing water amid its worst drought in 1,200 years". CBS News.
  16. ^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. xxiii, Table ES.3; Teske, ed. 2019, p. xxvii, Fig.5.
  17. ^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, Table ES.3 & p. 49; NREL 2017, pp. vi, 12
  18. ^ IPCC SRCCL Summary for Policymakers 2019, p. 18
  19. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, p. 17, SPM 3.2
  20. ^ NASA, 5 December 2008.
  21. ^ Weart "The Public and Climate Change: The Summer of 1988", "News reporters gave only a little attention ...".
  22. ^ Joo et al. 2015.
  23. ^ NOAA, 17 June 2015: "when scientists or public leaders talk about global warming these days, they almost always mean human-caused warming"; IPCC AR5 SYR Glossary 2014, p. 120: "Climate change refers to a change in the state of the climate that can be identified (e.g., by using statistical tests) by changes in the mean and/or the variability of its properties and that persists for an extended period, typically decades or longer. Climate change may be due to natural internal processes or external forcings such as modulations of the solar cycles, volcanic eruptions and persistent anthropogenic changes in the composition of the atmosphere or in land use."
  24. ^ NASA, 7 July 2020; Shaftel 2016: "'Climate change' and 'global warming' are often used interchangeably but have distinct meanings. ... Global warming refers to the upward temperature trend across the entire Earth since the early 20th century ... Climate change refers to a broad range of global phenomena ...[which] include the increased temperature trends described by global warming."; Associated Press, 22 September 2015: "The terms global warming and climate change can be used interchangeably. Climate change is more accurate scientifically to describe the various effects of greenhouse gases on the world because it includes extreme weather, storms and changes in rainfall patterns, ocean acidification and sea level.".
  25. ^ Hodder & Martin 2009; BBC Science Focus Magazine, 3 February 2020
  26. ^ The Guardian, 17 May 2019; BBC Science Focus Magazine, 3 February 2020
  27. ^ USA Today, 21 November 2019.
  28. ^ Oxford Languages 2019
  29. ^ Neukom et al. 2019b.
  30. ^ "Global Annual Mean Surface Air Temperature Change". NASA. Retrieved 23 February 2020.
  31. ^ EPA 2016: The U.S. Global Change Research Program, the National Academy of Sciences, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have each independently concluded that warming of the climate system in recent decades is "unequivocal". This conclusion is not drawn from any one source of data but is based on multiple lines of evidence, including three worldwide temperature datasets showing nearly identical warming trends as well as numerous other independent indicators of global warming (e.g. rising sea levels, shrinking Arctic sea ice).
  32. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2021, p. SPM-5
  33. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch1 2018, p. 81.
  34. ^ WMO 2021, p. 6.
  35. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch2 2013, p. 162.
  36. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch1 2018, p. 57: This report adopts the 51-year reference period, 1850–1900 inclusive, assessed as an approximation of pre-industrial levels in AR5 ... Temperatures rose by 0.0 °C–0.2 °C from 1720–1800 to 1850–1900; Hawkins et al. 2017, p. 1844
  37. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2013, pp. 4–5: "Global-scale observations from the instrumental era began in the mid-19th century for temperature and other variables ... the period 1880 to 2012 ... multiple independently produced datasets exist."
  38. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch5 2013, p. 386; Neukom et al. 2019a
  39. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch5 2013, pp. 389, 399–400: "The PETM [around 55.5–55.3 million years ago] was marked by ... global warming of 4 °C to 7 °C ... Deglacial global warming occurred in two main steps from 17.5 to 14.5 ka [thousand years ago] and 13.0 to 10.0 ka."
  40. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch1 2018, p. 54.
  41. ^ Kennedy et al. 2010, p. S26. Figure 2.5.
  42. ^ Loeb et al. 2021.
  43. ^ Kennedy et al. 2010, pp. S26, S59–S60; USGCRP Chapter 1 2017, p. 35.
  44. ^ IPCC AR4 WG2 Ch1 2007, p. 99, Sec. 1.3.5.1
  45. ^ "Global Warming". NASA JPL. 3 June 2010. Retrieved 11 September 2020. Satellite measurements show warming in the troposphere but cooling in the stratosphere. This vertical pattern is consistent with global warming due to increasing greenhouse gases but inconsistent with warming from natural causes.
  46. ^ IPCC SRCCL Summary for Policymakers 2019, p. 7
  47. ^ Sutton, Dong & Gregory 2007.
  48. ^ "Climate Change: Ocean Heat Content". NOAA. 2018. Archived from the original on 12 February 2019. Retrieved 20 February 2019.
  49. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch3 2013, p. 257: "Ocean warming dominates the global energy change inventory. Warming of the ocean accounts for about 93% of the increase in the Earth's energy inventory between 1971 and 2010 (high confidence), with warming of the upper (0 to 700 m) ocean accounting for about 64% of the total.
  50. ^ von Schuckman, K.; Cheng, L.; Palmer, M. D.; Hansen, J.; et al. (7 September 2020). "Heat stored in the Earth system: where does the energy go?". Earth System Science Data. 12 (3): 2013–2041. Bibcode:2020ESSD...12.2013V. doi:10.5194/essd-12-2013-2020.
  51. ^ NOAA, 10 July 2011.
  52. ^ United States Environmental Protection Agency 2016, p. 5: "Black carbon that is deposited on snow and ice darkens those surfaces and decreases their reflectivity (albedo). This is known as the snow/ice albedo effect. This effect results in the increased absorption of radiation that accelerates melting."
  53. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch12 2013, p. 1062; IPCC SROCC Ch3 2019, p. 212.
  54. ^ NASA, 12 September 2018.
  55. ^ Delworth & Zeng 2012, p. 5; Franzke et al. 2020
  56. ^ National Research Council 2012, p. 9
  57. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch10 2013, p. 916.
  58. ^ Knutson 2017, p. 443; IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch10 2013, pp. 875–876
  59. ^ a b USGCRP 2009, p. 20.
  60. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2013, pp. 13–14
  61. ^ NASA. "The Causes of Climate Change". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Archived from the original on 8 May 2019. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
  62. ^ IPCC AR4 WG1 Ch1 2007, FAQ1.1: "To emit 240 W m−2, a surface would have to have a temperature of around −19 °C. This is much colder than the conditions that actually exist at the Earth's surface (the global mean surface temperature is about 14 °C).
  63. ^ ACS. "What Is the Greenhouse Effect?". Archived from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 26 May 2019.
  64. ^ Ozone acts as a greenhouse gas in the lowest layer of the atmosphere, the troposphere (as opposed to the stratospheric ozone layer). Wang, Shugart & Lerdau 2017
  65. ^ Schmidt et al. 2010; USGCRP Climate Science Supplement 2014, p. 742
  66. ^ The Guardian, 19 February 2020.
  67. ^ WMO 2021, p. 8.
  68. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. TS-35.
  69. ^ IPCC AR6 WG3 Summary for Policymakers 2022, Figure SPM.1.
  70. ^ Olivier & Peters 2019, p. 17; Our World in Data, 18 September 2020; EPA 2020: Greenhouse gas emissions from industry primarily come from burning fossil fuels for energy, as well as greenhouse gas emissions from certain chemical reactions necessary to produce goods from raw materials;"Redox, extraction of iron and transition metals". Hot air (oxygen) reacts with the coke (carbon) to produce carbon dioxide and heat energy to heat up the furnace. Removing impurities: The calcium carbonate in the limestone thermally decomposes to form calcium oxide. calcium carbonate → calcium oxide + carbon dioxide; Kvande 2014: Carbon dioxide gas is formed at the anode, as the carbon anode is consumed upon reaction of carbon with the oxygen ions from the alumina (Al2O3). Formation of carbon dioxide is unavoidable as long as carbon anodes are used, and it is of great concern because CO2 is a greenhouse gas
  71. ^ EPA 2020; Global Methane Initiative 2020: Estimated Global Anthropogenic Methane Emissions by Source, 2020: Enteric fermentation (27%), Manure Management (3%), Coal Mining (9%), Municipal Solid Waste (11%), Oil & Gas (24%), Wastewater (7%), Rice Cultivation (7%)
  72. ^ EPA 2019: Agricultural activities, such as fertilizer use, are the primary source of N2O emissions; Davidson 2009: 2.0% of manure nitrogen and 2.5% of fertilizer nitrogen was converted to nitrous oxide between 1860 and 2005; these percentage contributions explain the entire pattern of increasing nitrous oxide concentrations over this period
  73. ^ IPCC SRCCL Summary for Policymakers 2019, p. 10
  74. ^ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, p. 450.
  75. ^ Haywood 2016, p. 456; McNeill 2017; Samset et al. 2018.
  76. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch2 2013, p. 183.
  77. ^ He et al. 2018; Storelvmo et al. 2016
  78. ^ Wild et al. 2005; Storelvmo et al. 2016; Samset et al. 2018.
  79. ^ Twomey 1977.
  80. ^ Albrecht 1989.
  81. ^ a b c USGCRP Chapter 2 2017, p. 78.
  82. ^ Ramanathan & Carmichael 2008; RIVM 2016.
  83. ^ Sand et al. 2015
  84. ^ World Resources Institute, 31 March 2021
  85. ^ Ritchie & Roser 2018
  86. ^ The Sustainability Consortium, 13 September 2018; UN FAO 2016, p. 18.
  87. ^ IPCC SRCCL Summary for Policymakers 2019, p. 18
  88. ^ Curtis et al. 2018
  89. ^ a b World Resources Institute, 8 December 2019
  90. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch2 2019, p. 172: "The global biophysical cooling alone has been estimated by a larger range of climate models and is −0.10 ± 0.14 °C; it ranges from −0.57 °C to +0.06°C ... This cooling is essentially dominated by increases in surface albedo: historical land cover changes have generally led to a dominant brightening of land"
  91. ^ Schmidt, Shindell & Tsigaridis 2014; Fyfe et al. 2016.
  92. ^ National Academies 2008, p. 6
  93. ^ "Is the Sun causing global warming?". Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Archived from the original on 5 May 2019. Retrieved 10 May 2019.
  94. ^ IPCC AR4 WG1 Ch9 2007, pp. 702–703; Randel et al. 2009.
  95. ^ USGCRP Chapter 2 2017, p. 79
  96. ^ Fischer & Aiuppa 2020.
  97. ^ "Thermodynamics: Albedo". NSIDC. Archived from the original on 11 October 2017. Retrieved 10 October 2017.
  98. ^ "The study of Earth as an integrated system". Vitals Signs of the Planet. Earth Science Communications Team at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory / California Institute of Technology. 2013. Archived from the original on 26 February 2019.
  99. ^ a b USGCRP Chapter 2 2017, pp. 89–91.
  100. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. 58: The net effect of changes in clouds in response to global warming is to amplify human-induced warming, that is, the net cloud feedback is positive (high confidence)
  101. ^ USGCRP Chapter 2 2017, pp. 89–90.
  102. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 2013, p. 14
  103. ^ Wolff et al. 2015: "the nature and magnitude of these feedbacks are the principal cause of uncertainty in the response of Earth's climate (over multi-decadal and longer periods) to a particular emissions scenario or greenhouse gas concentration pathway."
  104. ^ Williams, Ceppi & Katavouta 2020.
  105. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. 58,59: clouds remain the largest contribution to overall uncertainty in climate feedbacks
  106. ^ NASA, 28 May 2013.
  107. ^ Cohen et al. 2014.
  108. ^ a b Turetsky et al. 2019
  109. ^ Dean et al. 2018.
  110. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. 58: Feedback processes are expected to become more positive overall (more amplifying of global surface temperature changes) on multi-decadal time scales as the spatial pattern of surface warming evolves and global surface temperature increases.
  111. ^ NASA, 16 June 2011: "So far, land plants and the ocean have taken up about 55 percent of the extra carbon people have put into the atmosphere while about 45 percent has stayed in the atmosphere. Eventually, the land and oceans will take up most of the extra carbon dioxide, but as much as 20 percent may remain in the atmosphere for many thousands of years."
  112. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch2 2019, pp. 133, 144.
  113. ^ Melillo et al. 2017: Our first-order estimate of a warming-induced loss of 190 Pg of soil carbon over the 21st century is equivalent to the past two decades of carbon emissions from fossil fuel burning.
  114. ^ USGCRP Chapter 2 2017, pp. 93–95.
  115. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. TS-122, Box TS.5, Figure 1
  116. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR Glossary 2014, p. 120.
  117. ^ Wolff et al. 2015
  118. ^ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "Who does climate modelling around the world?"
  119. ^ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "What are the different types of climate models?"
  120. ^ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "What is a climate model?"
  121. ^ IPCC AR4 WG1 Ch8 2007, FAQ 8.1.
  122. ^ Stroeve et al. 2007; National Geographic, 13 August 2019
  123. ^ Liepert & Previdi 2009.
  124. ^ Rahmstorf et al. 2007; Mitchum et al. 2018
  125. ^ USGCRP Chapter 15 2017.
  126. ^ Carbon Brief, 15 January 2018, "What are the inputs and outputs for a climate model?"
  127. ^ Matthews et al. 2009
  128. ^ Carbon Brief, 19 April 2018; Meinshausen 2019, p. 462.
  129. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2021, p. SPM-17
  130. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. TS-30.
  131. ^ Rogelj et al. 2019
  132. ^ a b IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, p. 12
  133. ^ IPCC AR5 WG3 Ch5 2014, pp. 379–380.
  134. ^ Hansen et al. 2016; Smithsonian, 26 June 2016.
  135. ^ USGCRP Chapter 15 2017, p. 415.
  136. ^ Scientific American, 29 April 2014; Burke & Stott 2017.
  137. ^ USGCRP Chapter 9 2017, p. 260.
  138. ^ Studholme, Joshua; Fedorov, Alexey V.; Gulev, Sergey K.; Emanuel, Kerry; Hodges, Kevin (29 December 2021). "Poleward expansion of tropical cyclone latitudes in warming climates". Nature Geoscience. 15: 14–28. doi:10.1038/s41561-021-00859-1. S2CID 245540084.
  139. ^ "Hurricanes and Climate Change". Center for Climate and Energy Solutions. 10 July 2020.
  140. ^ NOAA 2017.
  141. ^ WMO 2021, p. 12.
  142. ^ IPCC SROCC Ch4 2019, p. 324: GMSL (global mean sea level, red) will rise between 0.43 m (0.29–0.59 m, likely range) (RCP2.6) and 0.84 m (0.61–1.10 m, likely range) (RCP8.5) by 2100 (medium confidence) relative to 1986–2005.
  143. ^ DeConto & Pollard 2016.
  144. ^ Bamber et al. 2019.
  145. ^ Zhang et al. 2008
  146. ^ IPCC SROCC Summary for Policymakers 2019, p. 18
  147. ^ Doney et al. 2009.
  148. ^ Deutsch et al. 2011
  149. ^ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, p. 510;"Climate Change and Harmful Algal Blooms". EPA. 5 September 2013. Retrieved 11 September 2020.
  150. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch3 2018, p. 283.
  151. ^ Armstrong McKay, David I.; Staal, Arie; Abrams, Jesse F.; Winkelmann, Ricarda; Sakschewski, Boris; Loriani, Sina; Fetzer, Ingo; Cornell, Sarah E.; Rockström, Johan; Lenton, Timothy M. (9 September 2022). "Exceeding 1.5°C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points". Science. 377 (6611): eabn7950. doi:10.1126/science.abn7950. ISSN 0036-8075.
  152. ^ "Tipping points in Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets". NESSC. 12 November 2018. Retrieved 25 February 2019.
  153. ^ IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, p. 7
  154. ^ Clark et al. 2008
  155. ^ Pearce, Rosamund; Prater, Tom (10 February 2020). "Nine Tipping Points That Could Be Triggered by Climate Change". CarbonBrief. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  156. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2021, p. 21
  157. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch12 2013, pp. 88–89, FAQ 12.3
  158. ^ IPCC AR5 WG1 Ch12 2013, p. 1112.
  159. ^ Crucifix 2016
  160. ^ Smith et al. 2009; Levermann et al. 2013
  161. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch3 2018, p. 218.
  162. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch2 2019, p. 133.
  163. ^ IPCC SRCCL Summary for Policymakers 2019, p. 7; Zeng & Yoon 2009.
  164. ^ Turner et al. 2020, p. 1.
  165. ^ Urban 2015.
  166. ^ Poloczanska et al. 2013; Lenoir et al. 2020
  167. ^ Smale et al. 2019
  168. ^ IPCC SROCC Summary for Policymakers 2019, p. 13.
  169. ^ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, p. 510
  170. ^ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, p. 451.
  171. ^ "Coral Reef Risk Outlook". National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved 4 April 2020. At present, local human activities, coupled with past thermal stress, threaten an estimated 75 percent of the world's reefs. By 2030, estimates predict more than 90% of the world's reefs will be threatened by local human activities, warming, and acidification, with nearly 60% facing high, very high, or critical threat levels.
  172. ^ Carbon Brief, 7 January 2020.
  173. ^ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch28 2014, p. 1596: "Within 50 to 70 years, loss of hunting habitats may lead to elimination of polar bears from seasonally ice-covered areas, where two-thirds of their world population currently live."
  174. ^ "What a changing climate means for Rocky Mountain National Park". National Park Service. Retrieved 9 April 2020.
  175. ^ IPCC AR6 WG1 Summary for Policymakers 2021, Fig. SPM.6, page=SPM-23
  176. ^ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch18 2014, pp. 983, 1008
  177. ^ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch19 2014, p. 1077.
  178. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, p. 8, SPM 2
  179. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, p. 13, SPM 2.3
  180. ^ WHO, Nov 2015
  181. ^ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch11 2014, pp. 720–723
  182. ^ Costello et al. 2009; Watts et al. 2015; IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch11 2014, p. 713
  183. ^ Watts et al. 2019, pp. 1836, 1848.
  184. ^ Watts et al. 2019, pp. 1841, 1847.
  185. ^ WHO 2014
  186. ^ Springmann et al. 2016, p. 2; Haines & Ebi 2019
  187. ^ IPCC AR6 WG2 2022, p. 988
  188. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, p. 451.
  189. ^ Zhao et al. 2017; IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, p. 439
  190. ^ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch7 2014, p. 488
  191. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, p. 462
  192. ^ IPCC SROCC Ch5 2019, p. 503.
  193. ^ Holding et al. 2016; IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch3 2014, pp. 232–233.
  194. ^ DeFries et al. 2019, p. 3; Krogstrup & Oman 2019, p. 10.
  195. ^ Diffenbaugh & Burke 2019; The Guardian, 26 January 2015; Burke, Davis & Diffenbaugh 2018.
  196. ^ a b Women's leadership and gender equality in climate action and disaster risk reduction in Africa − A call for action. Accra: FAO & The African Risk Capacity (ARC) Group. 2021. doi:10.4060/cb7431en. ISBN 978-92-5-135234-2. S2CID 243488592.
  197. ^ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch13 2014, pp. 796–797
  198. ^ Hallegatte et al. 2016, p. 12.
  199. ^ IPCC AR5 WG2 Ch13 2014, p. 796.
  200. ^ Grabe, Grose and Dutt, 2014; FAO, 2011; FAO, 2021a; Fisher and Carr, 2015; IPCC, 2014; Resurrección et al., 2019; UNDRR, 2019; Yeboah et al., 2019.
  201. ^ "Climate Change | United Nations For Indigenous Peoples". United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
  202. ^ Mach et al. 2019.
  203. ^ IPCC SROCC Ch4 2019, p. 328.
  204. ^ UNHCR 2011, p. 3.
  205. ^ Matthews 2018, p. 399.
  206. ^ Balsari, Dresser & Leaning 2020
  207. ^ Flavell 2014, p. 38; Kaczan & Orgill-Meyer 2020
  208. ^ Serdeczny et al. 2016.
  209. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, pp. 439, 464.
  210. ^ National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "What is nuisance flooding?". Retrieved 8 April 2020.
  211. ^ Kabir et al. 2016.
  212. ^ Van Oldenborgh et al. 2019.
  213. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR Glossary 2014, p. 125.
  214. ^ IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, p. 15
  215. ^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. XX
  216. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, p. 109.
  217. ^ a b Teske, ed. 2019, p. xxiii.
  218. ^ World Resources Institute, 8 August 2019
  219. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch3 2018, p. 266: Where reforestation is the restoration of natural ecosystems, it benefits both carbon sequestration and conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services.
  220. ^ Bui et al. 2018, p. 1068; IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, p. 17
  221. ^ IPCC SR15 2018, p. 34; IPCC SR15 Summary for Policymakers 2018, p. 17
  222. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, pp. 347–352
  223. ^ Friedlingstein et al. 2019
  224. ^ a b United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. 46; Vox, 20 September 2019;Sepulveda, Nestor A.; Jenkins, Jesse D.; De Sisternes, Fernando J.; Lester, Richard K. (2018). "The Role of Firm Low-Carbon Electricity Resources in Deep Decarbonization of Power Generation". Joule. 2 (11): 2403–2420. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.08.006.
  225. ^ REN21 2020, p. 32, Fig.1.
  226. ^ Our World in Data-Why did renewables become so cheap so fast?; IEA – Projected Costs of Generating Electricity 2020
  227. ^ The Guardian, 6 April 2020.
  228. ^ IEA 2021, p. 57, Fig 2.5; Teske et al. 2019, p. 180, Table 8.1
  229. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, p. 131, Figure 2.15
  230. ^ Teske 2019, pp. 409–410.
  231. ^ United Nations Environment Programme 2019, p. XXIII, Table ES.3; Teske, ed. 2019, p. xxvii, Fig.5.
  232. ^ a b IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, pp. 142–144; United Nations Environment Programme 2019, Table ES.3 & p. 49
  233. ^ "Transport emissions". Climate action. European Commission. 2016. Archived from the original on 10 October 2021. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
  234. ^ IPCC AR5 WG3 Ch9 2014, p. 697; NREL 2017, pp. vi, 12
  235. ^ Berrill et al. 2016.
  236. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, pp. 324–325.
  237. ^ Gill, Matthew; Livens, Francis; Peakman, Aiden. "Nuclear Fission". In Letcher (2020), pp. 147–149.
  238. ^ Horvath, Akos; Rachlew, Elisabeth (January 2016). "Nuclear power in the 21st century: Challenges and possibilities". Ambio. 45 (Suppl 1): S38–49. doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0732-y. ISSN 1654-7209. PMC 4678124. PMID 26667059.
  239. ^ "Hydropower". iea.org. International Energy Agency. Retrieved 12 October 2020. Hydropower generation is estimated to have increased by over 2% in 2019 owing to continued recovery from drought in Latin America as well as strong capacity expansion and good water availability in China (...) capacity expansion has been losing speed. This downward trend is expected to continue, due mainly to less large-project development in China and Brazil, where concerns over social and environmental impacts have restricted projects.
  240. ^ Watts et al. 2019, p. 1854; WHO 2018, p. 27
  241. ^ Watts et al. 2019, p. 1837; WHO 2016
  242. ^ WHO 2018, p. 27; Vandyck et al. 2018; IPCC SR15 2018, p. 97: "Limiting warming to 1.5 °C can be achieved synergistically with poverty alleviation and improved energy security and can provide large public health benefits through improved air quality, preventing millions of premature deaths. However, specific mitigation measures, such as bioenergy, may result in trade-offs that require consideration."
  243. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, p. 97
  244. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, p. 29; IEA 2020b
  245. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, p. 155, Fig. 2.27
  246. ^ IEA 2020b
  247. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, p. 142
  248. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, pp. 138–140
  249. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch2 2018, pp. 141–142
  250. ^ IPCC AR5 WG3 Ch9 2014, pp. 686–694.
  251. ^ World Resources Institute, December 2019, p. 1
  252. ^ World Resources Institute, December 2019, pp. 1, 3
  253. ^ IPCC SRCCL 2019, p. 22, B.6.2
  254. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, pp. 487, 488, FIGURE 5.12 Humans on a vegan exclusive diet would save about 7.9 GtCO2 equivalent per year by 2050 IPCC AR6 WG1 Technical Summary 2021, p. 51 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use used an average of 12 GtCO2 per year between 2007 and 2016 (23% of total anthropogenic emissions).
  255. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, pp. 82, 162, FIGURE 1.1
  256. ^ "Low and zero emissions in the steel and cement industries" (PDF). pp. 11, 19–22.
  257. ^ World Resources Institute, 8 August 2019: IPCC SRCCL Ch2 2019, pp. 189–193.
  258. ^ Kreidenweis et al. 2016
  259. ^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, pp. 95–102
  260. ^ National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2019, pp. 45–54
  261. ^ Ruseva et al. 2020
  262. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, pp. 326–327; Bednar, Obersteiner & Wagner 2019; European Commission, 28 November 2018, p. 188
  263. ^ Bui et al. 2018, p. 1068.
  264. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, p. 125; Bednar, Obersteiner & Wagner 2019.
  265. ^ IPCC SR15 2018, p. 34
  266. ^ a b IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, pp. 396–397.
  267. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, p. 17.
  268. ^ IPCC AR4 WG2 Ch19 2007, p. 796.
  269. ^ UNEP 2018, pp. xii–xiii.
  270. ^ Stephens, Scott A; Bell, Robert G; Lawrence, Judy (2018). "Developing signals to trigger adaptation to sea-level rise". Environmental Research Letters. 13 (10). 104004. Bibcode:2018ERL....13j4004S. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aadf96. ISSN 1748-9326.
  271. ^ Matthews 2018, p. 402.
  272. ^ IPCC SRCCL Ch5 2019, p. 439.
  273. ^ Surminski, Swenja; Bouwer, Laurens M.; Linnerooth-Bayer, Joanne (2016). "How insurance can support climate resilience". Nature Climate Change. 6 (4): 333–334. Bibcode:2016NatCC...6..333S. doi:10.1038/nclimate2979. ISSN 1758-6798.
  274. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch4 2018, pp. 336–337.
  275. ^ Morecroft, Michael D.; Duffield, Simon; Harley, Mike; Pearce-Higgins, James W.; et al. (2019). "Measuring the success of climate change adaptation and mitigation in terrestrial ecosystems". Science. 366 (6471): eaaw9256. doi:10.1126/science.aaw9256. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 31831643. S2CID 209339286.
  276. ^ Berry, Pam M.; Brown, Sally; Chen, Minpeng; Kontogianni, Areti; et al. (2015). "Cross-sectoral interactions of adaptation and mitigation measures". Climatic Change. 128 (3): 381–393. Bibcode:2015ClCh..128..381B. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1214-0. ISSN 1573-1480. S2CID 153904466.
  277. ^ Sharifi, Ayyoob (2020). "Trade-offs and conflicts between urban climate change mitigation and adaptation measures: A literature review". Journal of Cleaner Production. 276: 122813. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122813. ISSN 0959-6526. S2CID 225638176.
  278. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR 2014, p. 54.
  279. ^ IPCC AR5 SYR Summary for Policymakers 2014, p. 17, Section 3
  280. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch5 2018, p. 447; United Nations (2017) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 6 July 2017, Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (A/RES/71/313)
  281. ^ IPCC SR15 Ch5 2018, p. 477.
  282. ^ Rauner et al. 2020
  283. ^ Mercure et al. 2018
  284. ^ World Bank, June 2019, p. 12, Box 1
  285. ^ Union of Concerned Scientists, 8 January 2017; Hagmann, Ho & Loewenstein 2019.
  286. ^ Watts et al. 2019, p. 1866
  287. ^ UN Human Development Report 2020, p. 10
  288. ^ International Institute for Sustainable Development 2019, p. iv
  289. ^ ICCT 2019, p. iv; Natural Resources Defense Council, 29 September 2017
  290. ^ National Conference of State Legislators, 17 April 2020; European Parliament, February 2020
  291. ^ Gabbatiss, Josh; Tandon, Ayesha (4 October 2021). "In-depth Q&A: What is 'climate justice'?". Carbon Brief. Retrieved 16 October 2021.
  292. ^ Carbon Brief, 4 Jan 2017.
  293. ^ a b Friedlingstein et al. 2019, Table 7.
  294. ^ UNFCCC, "What is the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change?"
  295. ^ UNFCCC 1992, Article 2.
  296. ^ IPCC AR4 WG3 Ch1 2007, p. 97.
  297. ^ EPA 2019.
  298. ^ UNFCCC, "What are United Nations Climate Change Conferences?"
  299. ^ Kyoto Protocol 1997; Liverman 2009, p. 290.
  300. ^ Dessai 2001, p. 4; Grubb 2003.
  301. ^ Liverman 2009, p. 290.
  302. ^ Müller 2010; The New York Times, 25 May 2015; UNFCCC: Copenhagen 2009; EUobserver, 20 December 2009.
  303. ^ UNFCCC: Copenhagen 2009.
  304. ^ Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change. Copenhagen. 7–18 December 2009. un document= FCCC/CP/2009/L.7. Archived from the original on 18 October 2010. Retrieved 24 October 2010.
  305. ^ Cui, Lianbiao; Sun, Yi; Song, Malin; Zhu, Lei (2020). "Co-financing in the green climate fund: lessons from the global environment facility". Climate Policy. 20 (1): 95–108. doi:10.1080/14693062.2019.1690968. ISSN 1469-3062. S2CID 213694904.
  306. ^ Paris Agreement 2015.
  307. ^ Climate Focus 2015, p. 3; Carbon Brief, 8 October 2018.
  308. ^ Climate Focus 2015, p. 5.
  309. ^ "Status of Treaties, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change". United Nations Treaty Collection. Retrieved 13 October 2021.; Salon, 25 September 2019.
  310. ^ Goyal et al. 2019
  311. ^ Yeo, Sophie (10 October 2016). "Explainer: Why a UN climate deal on HFCs matters". Carbon Brief. Retrieved 10 January 2021.
  312. ^ BBC, 1 May 2019; Vice, 2 May 2019.
  313. ^ The Verge, 27 December 2019.
  314. ^ The Guardian, 28 November 2019
  315. ^ Politico, 11 December 2019.
  316. ^ The Guardian, 28 October 2020
  317. ^ "European Green Deal: Commission proposes transformation of EU economy and society to meet climate ambitions". European Commission. 14 July 2021.
  318. ^ "India". Climate Action Tracker. 15 September 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
  319. ^ UN NDC Synthesis Report 2021, pp. 4–5;UNFCCC Press Office (26 February 2021). "Greater Climate Ambition Urged as Initial NDC Synthesis Report Is Published". Retrieved 21 April 2021.
  320. ^ Stover 2014.
  321. ^ Dunlap & McCright 2011, pp. 144, 155; Björnberg et al. 2017
  322. ^ Oreskes & Conway 2010; Björnberg et al. 2017
  323. ^ O’Neill & Boykoff 2010; Björnberg et al. 2017
  324. ^ a b Björnberg et al. 2017
  325. ^ Dunlap & McCright 2015, p. 308.
  326. ^ Dunlap & McCright 2011, p. 146.
  327. ^ Harvey et al. 2018
  328. ^ "Public perceptions on climate change" (PDF). PERITIA Trust EU - The Policy Institute of Kings College London. June 2022. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2022.
  329. ^ Powell, James (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. S2CID 213454806.
  330. ^ Myers, Krista F.; Doran, Peter T.; Cook, John; Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A. (20 October 2021). "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (10): 104030. Bibcode:2021ERL....16j4030M. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774. S2CID 239047650.
  331. ^ a b Weart "The Public and Climate Change (since 1980)"
  332. ^ Newell 2006, p. 80; Yale Climate Connections, 2 November 2010
  333. ^ Pew 2015, p. 10.
  334. ^ a b Pew 2020.
  335. ^ Pew 2015, p. 15.
  336. ^ Yale 2021, p. 7.
  337. ^ Yale 2021, p. 9; UNDP 2021, p. 15.
  338. ^ Smith & Leiserowitz 2013, p. 943.
  339. ^ Gunningham 2018.
  340. ^ The Guardian, 19 March 2019; Boulianne, Lalancette & Ilkiw 2020.
  341. ^ Deutsche Welle, 22 June 2019.
  342. ^ Connolly, Kate (29 April 2021). "'Historic' German ruling says climate goals not tough enough". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 May 2021.
  343. ^ Setzer & Byrnes 2019.
  344. ^ "Coal Consumption Affecting Climate". Rodney and Otamatea Times, Waitemata and Kaipara Gazette. Warkworth, New Zealand. 14 August 1912. p. 7. Text was earlier published in Popular Mechanics, March 1912, p. 341.
  345. ^ Archer & Pierrehumbert 2013, pp. 10–14
  346. ^ Foote, Eunice (November 1856). Circumstances affecting the Heat of the Sun's Rays. The American Journal of Science and Arts. Vol. 22. pp. 382–383. Retrieved 31 January 2016.
  347. ^ Huddleston 2019
  348. ^ Tyndall 1861.
  349. ^ Archer & Pierrehumbert 2013, pp. 39–42; Fleming 2008, Tyndall
  350. ^ Lapenis 1998.
  351. ^ a b c Weart "The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect"; Fleming 2008, Arrhenius
  352. ^ Callendar 1938; Fleming 2007.
  353. ^ Weart "Suspicions of a Human-Caused Greenhouse (1956–1969)"
  354. ^ Weart "The Public and Climate Change: The Summer of 1988", "News reporters gave only a little attention ...".
  355. ^ Weart 2013, p. 3567.
  356. ^ Powell, James (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 37 (4): 183–184. doi:10.1177/0270467619886266. S2CID 213454806. Retrieved 15 November 2020.
  357. ^ a b Lynas, Mark; Houlton, Benjamin Z; Perry, Simon (2021). "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters. 16 (11): 114005. Bibcode:2021ERL....16k4005L. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966. ISSN 1748-9326. S2CID 239032360.
  358. ^ National Academies 2008, p. 2; Oreskes 2007, p. 68; Gleick, 7 January 2017
  359. ^ Joint statement of the G8+5 Academies (2009); Gleick, 7 January 2017.
  360. ^ Royal Society 2005.

Sources

IPCC reports

Fourth Assessment Report

Fifth Assessment report

Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 °C

Special Report: Climate change and Land

Special Report: The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate

Sixth Assessment Report

Other peer-reviewed sources

Books, reports and legal documents

Non-technical sources

External links

Media files used on this page

20210331 Global tree cover loss - World Resources Institute.svg
Author/Creator: RCraig09, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Stacked column chart showing annual loss of tree cover, globally, based on World Resources Institute data published on Mongabay.
Global Energy Consumption.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Global sources for energy from 2000 to 2020. The trend since 2015 is also highlighted in this adaptation of a chart from the global carbon project. The specific data is from the Global Carbon Budget 2021 (distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License), based on the image "Changes in global energy consumption".
Climate change icon.png
Author/Creator: Tommaso.sansone91, Licence: CC0
Climate change is a change in the statistical distribution of weather patterns when that change lasts for an extended period of time (i.e., decades to millions of years)
The Earth seen from Apollo 17.jpg
"The Blue Marble" is a famous photograph of the Earth taken on December 7, 1972, by the crew of the Apollo 17 spacecraft en route to the Moon at a distance of about 29,000 kilometres (18,000 mi). It shows Africa, Antarctica, and the Arabian Peninsula.
Scholia logo.svg
Author/Creator: Lars Willighagen, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
SVG remake of proposal for Scholia logo (File:Scholia logo.png by User:Theklan).
The Earth seen from Apollo 17 with transparent background.png
"The Blue Marble" is a famous photograph of the Earth taken on December 7, 1972 by the crew of the Apollo 17 spacecraft en route to the Moon at a distance of about 29,000 kilometers (18,000 statute miles). It shows Africa, Antarctica, and the Arabian Peninsula.
WikiProject Geology.svg
Author/Creator: unknown, Licence: CC BY-SA 2.5
Bleached colony of Acropora coral.jpg
Author/Creator: Vardhanjp, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Bleached colony of Acropora coral_Andaman islands
20211109 Frequency of extreme weather for different degrees of global warming - bar chart IPCC AR6 WG1 SPM.svg
Author/Creator: RCraig09, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Bar chart showing frequency of extreme weather for different degrees of global warming, based on data from IPCC AR6 WG1 SPM (Summary for Policy Makers).
Translate this file This SVG file contains embedded text that can be translated into your language, using any capable SVG editor, text editor or the SVG Translate tool. For more information see: About translating SVG files.
  • Suggested caption: : The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (2021) projected multiplicative increases in the frequency of extreme events compared to the pre-industrial era for heat waves, droughts and heavy precipitation events, for various global warming scenarios.
  • Based on data from Fig. SPM.6 of:
Climate Change 2021 / The Physical Science Basis / Working Group I contribution to the WGI Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / Summary for Policymakers. IPCC.ch SPM-23. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (9 August 2021). Archived from the original on 4 November 2021.
{{cite web |title=Climate Change 2021 / The Physical Science Basis / Working Group I contribution to the WGI Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change / Summary for Policymakers |url=https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf |website=IPCC.ch |publisher=Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211104175351/https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM_final.pdf |archive-date=4 November 2021 |location=Fig. SPM.6 |page=SPM-23 |date=9 August 2021 |url-status=live }}
  • Data for 3 °C, not specifically in the Summary for Policy Makers (SPM), is based on Fig. TS.12 on page TS-124 of the longer Technical Summary document (archive).
  • SPM source states:
  • Hot temperature extremes over land - 10-year event - Frequency and increase in intensity of extreme temperature event that occurred once in 10 years on average in a climate without human influence
  • Hot temperature extremes over land - 50-year event - Frequency and increase in intensity of extreme temperature event that occurred once in 50 years on average in a climate without human influence
  • Heavy precipitation over land - 10-year event - Frequency and increase in intensity of heavy 1-day precipitation event that occurred once in 10 years on average in a climate without human influence
  • Agricultural & ecological droughts in drying regions - 10-year event - Frequency and increase in intensity of an agricultural and ecological drought event that occurred once in 10 years on average across drying regions in a climate without human influence
  • Uploader strikes out and increase in intensity because that data from source is not included in the chart uploaded above.
  • Uploader generated much of the SVG code using the Horizontal bar charts spreadsheet linked below. Minor additions, moves, and nudges were done manually.
General concept above; examples below.
Warming stripes (composite)
Warming stripes bar chart
Bar chart (vertical)
Pie chart
Line charts
Scatterplot

I've uploaded .xlsx (Microsoft Excel) spreadsheets that automatically generate XML code for charts in SVG format.

You simply paste your X-Y data into the spreadsheet, and specify image dimensions, number of grid lines, font sizes, etc. The spreadsheet instantly and automatically generates a column of XML code that you simply copy and paste into a text editor and save as an ".svg" file. It produces lean SVG code, avoiding the "extra stuff" that Inkscape inserts, and should save you time.

Feedback and suggestions on my talk page are welcome. RCraig09 (talk) 23:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Click HOW TO for detailed explanation.
Click here to see examples of warming stripes embedded in different shapes.
  • Warming stripes bar chart (download v1.0) Creates a bar chart whose individual bars/columns are coloured according to Dr. Hawkins' warming stripes colour scheme. Alternate option: choose one colour for ascending bars and another colour for descending bars. One dataset only (updated 27 Jan 2022).
  • Line charts (download v2.2)— Accepts up to five datasets for LINE charts (example at right) (updated 25 Jan 2022).
  • Vertical bar charts (column charts) (download v1.1)— Accepts up to six datasets for VERTICAL BAR CHARTS (COLUMN CHARTS)—toggle between clustered and stacked charts; user can adjust "Yfloor"—the Y level (usually=0) from which columns rise or fall; user chooses to keep or ignore negative input values (example at right) (updated 25 Jan 2022).
  • Horizontal bar charts (download v1.0)— Accepts up to six datasets for HORIZONTAL BAR CHARTS—toggle between clustered and stacked charts; user can adjust "Yfloor"—the value (usually=0) from which bars extend; user chooses to keep or ignore negative input values (updated 27 Jan 2022).
  • Scatter plots (download v1.0)— Accepts up to five datasets for SCATTER PLOTS (updated 25 Jan 2022).
  • Pie charts (download v1.0)— Accepts a series of up to 36 items for PIE CHARTS (updated 26 Jan 2022).

See examples in Category:SVG diagrams created with spreadsheet.

En-Climate change-article.ogg
Author/Creator:

Speaker: thrownfootfalls

Authors of the article, Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0

This is a spoken word version of the Wikipedia article: Climate change

Total CO2 by Region.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
To track the largest emitters of carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels, this chart shows emissions per region from 2000 to 2020. The trend since 2015 is also highlighted in this adaptation of a chart from the Global Carbon Project. The specific source is [1] (distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License), based primarily on the image "Global CO2 emissions by region", with russian data aggregated in.
Bleachedcoral.jpg
(c) Acropora at English Wikipedia, CC BY-SA 3.0
Bleached branching coral (Acropora sp.) at Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef. Author: J. Roff
Bobcat Fire, Los Angeles, San Gabriel Mountains.jpg
Author/Creator: Eddiem360, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Bobcat Fire view from our kitchen window in Monrovia, CA, September 10, 2020
The Blue Marble (remastered).jpg
Full disk view of the Earth taken on December 7, 1972, by the crew of the Apollo 17 spacecraft en route to the Moon at a distance of about 29,000 kilometres (18,000 mi). It shows Africa, Antarctica, and the Arabian Peninsula.
Projected Change in Temperatures by 2090.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) multi-model mean projections (i.e., the average of the model projections available). Changes are shown relative to the 1850-1900. Data from the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report SPM.5.
Village Telly in Mali.jpg
Author/Creator: Ferdinand Reus from Arnhem, Holland, Licence: CC BY-SA 2.0
Telly, one of the first villages in the Bandiagara escarpment in Mali.
Orroral Valley Fire viewed from Tuggeranong January 2020.jpg
Author/Creator: Nick-D, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
The Orroral Valley Fire viewed from Tuggeranong on the evening of 28 January
20200327 Climate change deniers cherry picking time periods.gif
Author/Creator: RCraig09, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Animated GIF showing how climate change deniers cherry pick time periods to assert global temperatures are not rising.
  • Original source of data:
HadCRUT 4.6.0.0 NAVIGATION PAGE:
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/data/current/download.html
Choose "HadCRUT4 time series: ensemble medians and uncertainties", "Global (NH+SH)/2", "Annual".
SOURCE:
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/data/current/time_series/HadCRUT.4.6.0.0.annual_ns_avg.txt
ARCHIVE:
https://web.archive.org/web/20200323210439/https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/data/current/time_series/HadCRUT.4.6.0.0.annual_ns_avg.txt
Base: 1961-1990
  • Sources describing general principle involved:
Stover, Dawn (September 23, 2014). "The global warming 'hiatus'". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Archived from the original on July 11, 2020.
Zimmerman, Jess (November 7, 2011). "Handy image shows how climate deniers manipulate data". Grist. Archived from the original on October 1, 2019. (credits the following Skeptical Science article for its GIF)
The BEST Summary / Global Warming Continues. SkepticalScience.com (November 12, 2011). Archived from the original on November 13, 2011. Skeptical Science GIF: link (archive)
Mountain Pine Beetle damage in the Fraser Experimental Forest 2007.jpg
Mountain pine beetle outbreak on the Fraser Experimental Forest, Arapaho National Forest, Colorado, part of the Fraser Biosphere Reserve, 2007.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Economic Sector.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Emissions produced by different economic sectors, including emissions generated by electricity and heat production used by the sectors, according to the IPCC AR5 report. Specific source is the ugly SPM.2 graphic from http://mitigation2014.org/report/figures/summary-for-policymakers-figures/
Per Capita CO2 by Region.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
To track responsibility for climate change, this chart shows carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels per person per region from 2000 to 2020. The trend since 2015 is also highlighted in this adaptation of a chart from the Global Carbon Project. The specific source is [1] (distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License), based on the image "Global CO2 emissions per capita" with russian data added in.
Physical Drivers of climate change.svg
Author/Creator: Eric Fisk, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Contribution to observed climate change from 12 different drivers, as taken from the Summary for Policymakers of the sixth IPCC assessment report, adapted from figure SPM.2c.[1] Time period is 1850-1900 to 2010-2019. All contributions are from human activity, as natural variance and forcings have not contributed to warming in this time period.
US Navy 071120-M-8966H-005 An aerial view over southern Bangladesh reveals extensive flooding as a result of Cyclone Sidr.jpg
BANGLADESH (Nov. 20, 2007) An aerial view over southern Bangladesh reveals extensive flooding as a result of Cyclone Sidr. The Third Marine Expeditionary Force Humanitarian Assistance Survey Team conducted a flyover to assess the damage to affected areas in southern Bangladesh. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Staff Sgt. Julius Hawkins (RELEASED)
20220629 Public estimates of scientific consensus on climate change - horizontal bar chart.svg
Author/Creator: RCraig09, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Bar chart showing public estimates of scientific consensus on climate change in comparison to actual scientific consensus.
Archive thereof: https://web.archive.org/web/20220715062933/https://peritia-trust.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/4-Climate-change_EU.pdf
Archive thereof: https://web.archive.org/web/20220630171117/https://peritia-trust.eu/public-hugely-underestimate-scientific-consensus-on-climate-change-peritia-study-finds/
  • From source: "Carried out by the Policy Institute at King’s College London as part of a European Commission project investigating public trust in expertise, this latest study is based on survey data from over 12,000 people across six countries."
  • Source quotes consensus at 99.9% scientific consensus, citing Lynas, M et al (2021) ‘Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature,’ Environmental Research Letters 16(11): 1-7.
  1. Powell et al. (20 November 2019). "Scientists Reach 100% Consensus on Anthropogenic Global Warming". Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 37 (4): 183–184. DOI:10.1177/0270467619886266.
  2. Lynas et al. (19 October 2021). "Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature". Environmental Research Letters 16 (11): 114005.
  3. Myers, Krista F.; Doran, Peter T.; Cook, John; Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A. (20 October 2021). "Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later". Environmental Research Letters 16 (10): 104030. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/ac2774.
  • Suggested caption: The public substantially underestimates the degree of scientific consensus that humans are causing climate change.[cite Kings College] Studies from 2019–2021 found scientific consensus to range from 98.7–100%.[Cites: Powell, Lynas, Myers]
  • Most SVG code for this file was automatically generated using the "Horizontal bar charts" spreadsheet linked at User:RCraig09/Excel to XML for SVG. Minor additions and nudging were performed manually in text editor.
Translate this file This SVG file contains embedded text that can be translated into your language, using any capable SVG editor, text editor or the SVG Translate tool. For more information see: About translating SVG files.
NORTH POLE Ice (19626661335).jpg
Author/Creator: Christopher Michel , Licence: CC BY 2.0
NORTH POLE North Pole Keep
Climate Change Performance Index 2021.svg
Author/Creator: Chipmunkdavis, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
English (en):
  High
  Medium
  Low
  Very Low
Change in Average Temperature With Fahrenheit.svg
Author/Creator: NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio, Key and Title by uploader (Eric Fisk), Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Temperature changes to date have been most pronounced in northern latitudes and over land masses. The image uses longer term averages of at least a decade to smooth out climate variability due to factors such as El Niño. The map is improved from the highest quality rendering that NASA’s Scientific Visualization Studio generates, with horizontal and vertical lines removed and with a more legible projection of Kavraiskiy VII. Grey areas in the image have insufficient data for rendering. For a version without Fahrenheit, see File:Change in Average Temperature.svg
Carbon Dioxide 800kyr.svg
Author/Creator: Femke Nijsse, Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0
This figure shows the variations in concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere during the last 800 thousand years. Throughout most of the record, the largest changes can be related to glacial/interglacial cycles within the current ice age. Although the glacial cycles are thought to be directly caused by changes in the Earth's orbit (i.e. Milankovitch cycles), these changes also influence the carbon cycle, which in turn feeds back into the glacial system.

Since the Industrial Revolution, circa 1800, the burning of fossil fuels has caused a rapid increase of CO2 in the atmosphere, reaching levels unprecedented in the last million years. This increase has been implicated as a primary cause of global warming.

The spacing of carbon dioxide samples varies through time. At the present, the atmosphere is sampled routinely and complete annual averages are available. From the four ice cores presented on this plot the sampling varies from as rapid as one point every few years (recent parts of the Law Dome record) to as sparse as one sample every few thousand years (oldest parts of the Vostok and Dome C records). In principle, the sparse sampling in the oldest parts of the record could hide abrupt excursions; however, isotopic measurements of ice cores (which are made continuously along the entire core) and our current understanding of the rates of natural processes for creating and removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere make it unlikely that any positive excursions in carbon dioxide comparable to the Industrial Revolution have happened during the interval presented above.

This figure is an update on File:Carbon Dioxide 400kyr.png, originally made by User: Dragons flight originally made by Dragons flight. The explanation of the figure is also derived from that work. Two new data sets are added: the CO2 measurements from 2004 to 2019 and additional data from Dome C. Some other data sets were omitted for simplicity.

The code to produce this figure is freely available on Github: https://github.com/Femkemilene/Global-Warming-Figures. The first few lines of the code make it easy to change the language.
Corn shows the affect of drought.jpg
Corn shows the affect of drought in Texas on Aug. 20, 2013. USDA photo by Bob Nichols.
Carbon Dioxide Partitioning.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Between 1900 and 2020 most atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions have been absorbed by plant growth, soil uptake, and ocean uptake. How land and ocean carbon sinks will respond in the future is an area of uncertainty. Content is adapted from the 2020 Global Carbon Budget report, figure 3 (direct link: https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/12/3269/2020/#section3).
Greenhouse gas emission scenarios 01.svg
Author/Creator: Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser, adapted for svg and smartphone by Eric Fisk, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
What does the future of our carbon dioxide and greenhouse gas emissions look like. In the visualization we show a range of potential future scenarios of global greenhouse gas emissions (measured in gigatonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents), based on data from Climate Action Tracker. Interactive data of these pathways can be found here. Here, five scenarios are shown:
  • No climate policies: projected future emissions if no climate policies were implemented; this would result in an estimated 4.1-4.8°C warming by 2100 (relative to pre-industrial temperatures)
  • Current climate policies: projected warming of 3.1-3.7°C by 2100 based on current implemented climate policies
  • National pledges: if all countries achieve their current targets/pledges set within the Paris climate agreement, it’s estimated average warming by 2100 will be 2.6-3.2°C. This will go well beyond the overall target of the Paris Agreement to keep warming “well below 2°C”.
  • 2°C consistent: there are a range of emissions pathways that would be compatible with limiting average warming to 2°C by 2100. This would require a significant increase in ambition of the current pledges within the Paris Agreement.
  • 1.5°C consistent: there are a range of emissions pathways that would be compatible with limiting average warming to 1.5°C by 2100. However, all would require a very urgent and rapid reduction in global greenhouse gas emissions.
Common Era Temperature.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Temperatures with respect to the 1850-1900 mean as per IPCC definition of pre-industrial temperatures over the last 2 millennia and observational values ranging from 1880 to 2020. All data is smoothed using a 5 year moving average.

The 2000 year record is computed in https://www.nature.com/articles/s41561-019-0400-0 using a wide set of proxies that have been vetted by the Pages2k Consortium [1]. They include tree ring data, data from corals and ice core data. A direct link to data is at https://figshare.com/articles/Reconstruction_ensemble_median_and_95_range/8143094

The observational data set is pulled from NASA: https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/global-temperature/

NASA data is adjusted up by 0.188 degrees C since the IPCC says 2006 to 2015 is 0.87 degrees warmer than 1850 to 1900 and NASA averages 0.682 in that time frame.

The 2000 year temperature is adjusted up by 0.287667, which is the NASA adjustment from above plus 0.099667 for the NASA average from 1961 to 1990 (the baseline for the 2000 year data set).
Solar system.jpg
This is a montage of planetary images taken by spacecraft managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA. Included are (from top to bottom) images of Mercury, Venus, Earth (and Moon), Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The spacecraft responsible for these images are as follows:
  • the Mercury image was taken by Mariner 10,
  • the Venus image by Magellan,
  • the Earth and Moon images by Galileo,
  • the Mars image by Mars Global Surveyor,
  • the Jupiter image by Cassini, and
  • the Saturn, Uranus and Neptune images by Voyager.
  • Pluto is not shown as it is no longer a planet, and no spacecraft has yet visited it when this montage was taken. The inner planets (Mercury, Venus, Earth, Moon, and Mars) are roughly to scale to each other; the outer planets (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) are roughly to scale to each other. PIA 00545 is the same montage with Neptune shown larger in the foreground. Actual diameters are given below:
  • Sun (to photosphere) 1,392,684 km
  • Mercury 4,879.4 km
  • Venus 12,103.7 km
  • Earth 12,756.28 km
  • Moon 3,476.2 km
  • Mars 6,804.9 km
  • Jupiter 142,984 km
  • Saturn 120,536 km
  • Uranus 51,118 km
  • Neptune 49,528 km
Global Temperature And Forces With Fahrenheit.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Changes in global surface temperature over the past 170 years (black line) relative to 1850–1900 and annually averaged, compared to CMIP6 climate model simulations of the temperature response to both human and natural drivers (red), and to only natural drivers (solar and volcanic activity, green). Solid colored lines show the multi-model average, and colored shades show the range ("very likely") of simulations . Source: IPCC AR6 WGI, Figure SPM.1b, p. SPM-7. See Global Temperature And Forces.svg for a version without Fahrenheit.
The heat is on ESA19461898.jpeg

With some places expecting to be hit with air temperatures of over 40°C in the next days, much of Europe is in the grip of a heatwave – and one that is setting record highs for June. According to meteorologists this current bout of sweltering weather is down to hot air being drawn from north Africa.
This map shows the temperature of the land on 26 June. It has been generated using information from the Copernicus Sentinel-3’s Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer, which measures energy radiating from Earth’s surface in nine spectral bands – the map therefore represents temperature of the land surface, not air temperature which is normally used in forecasts. The white areas in the image are where cloud obscured readings of land temperature and the light blue patches are either low temperatures at the top of cloud or snow-covered areas.
Countries worst hit by this unusual June weather include Spain, France, Germany, Italy and Poland. In many places heat warnings have been issued and cities such as Paris have connected fountains and sprinklers to hydrants to help give people some relief. Wildfires in Catalonia, said to be the worst in two decades, have already ripped across 5000 hectares of land and are being blamed on the heat and strong winds.
Sea level history and projections.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Observed and projected changes in global mean sea level for 1800–2100. The boxes on the right show the very likely ranges in sea level rise by 2100 (relative to 2000) corresponding to three different RCP scenarios. The lines above the boxes show possible increases based on newer research of the potential contribution to sea level rise from Antarctic ice melt. Data from the U.S. Global Change Research Program for the Fourth National Climate Assessment. [https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/chapter/appendix-3#fig-A3-1 Direct link to specific source].
National Park Service Thawing permafrost (27759123542).jpg
Author/Creator: NPS Climate Change Response, Licence: CC BY 2.0

In Noatak National Preserve, Alaska, an exceptionally warm summer in 2004 triggered this 300m long slump associated with thawing permafrost.

NPS photo.
19120814 Coal Consumption Affecting Climate - Rodney and Otamatea Times.jpg
Newspaper article from 1912 describing how burning coal adds carbon dioxide to the atmosphere to cause global warming.
Čeština: Článek z Novozélandských novin (vydáno 14. srpna 1912) popisující principy globálního oteplování.
CO2 Emissions by Source Since 1880.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Carbon dioxide emissions by source since 1880 as calculated for the 2020 Global Carbon Budget. Carbon dioxide generated by land use changes (deforestation) has been added to as coal, oil, and natural gas consumption have each ramped up in turn.
Endangered arctic - starving polar bear edit.jpg
Author/Creator: Andreas Weith, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
From original: In summer, some polar bears do not make the transition from their winter residence on the Svalbard islands to the dense drift ice and pack ice of the high arctic where they would find a plethora of prey. This is due to global climate change which causes the ice around the islands to melt much earlier than previously. The bears need to adapt from their proper food to a diet of detritus, small animals, bird eggs and carcasses of marine animals. Very often they suffer starvation and are doomed to die. The number of these starving animals is sadly increasing.
Soil moisture and climate change.svg
Author/Creator: Efbrazil, Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0
Projected changes in average soil moisture, which is a predictor for issues like flooding, fires, drought, and agricultural failure. The standard deviation measure is commonly used to measure drought, where a -1 standard deviation means soil moisture will be the same as droughts that occurred once every six years between 1850 and 1900.

Data is taken from AR6 SPM.5d:

Acqua alta in Piazza San Marco-original.jpg
Author/Creator:
Control copyright icon.svg
This image is not public domain. Please respect the copyright protection. It may only be used according to the rules mentioned here. This specifically excludes use in social media, if applicable terms of the licenses listed here not appropriate.
Upload-problem2.svg
Please do not upload an updated image here without consultation with the Author. The author would like to make corrections only at his own source. This ensures that the changes are preserved.
Please if you think that any changes should be required, please inform the author.
Otherwise you can upload a new image with a new name. Please use one of the templates derivative or extract.
, Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0
Flooded Piazza San Marco in Venice